We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I'm very excited to find this formatter and it seems very promising. I do have a concern that I noticed right away.
I have this input file which uses a non-empty package_import_declaration in the module_ansi_header:
module Foo import FooPkg::*; import BarPkg::*; import GlobalPkg::*; import OtherPkg::*; ( input logic clk; output logic something; ); endmodule : Foo
The output is:
module Foo import FooPkg::*; import BarPkg::*; import GlobalPkg::*; import OtherPkg::*; (input logic clk; output logic something;); endmodule : Foo
It seems more reasonable to have each import on a separate line.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I'm very excited to find this formatter and it seems very promising. I do have a concern that I noticed right away.
I have this input file which uses a non-empty package_import_declaration in the module_ansi_header:
The output is:
It seems more reasonable to have each import on a separate line.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: