test tableless summary

_sass/jekyll-theme-minimal.scss

@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ strong {
 }
 
 section {
-  width:1500px;
+  width:500px;
   float:right;
   padding-bottom:50px;
 }

digitalconservation_summary.md

@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ title: Digital Conservation Practices and Perspectives - Summary of Findings
 ---
 
 
-| !["Img 1"](assets/img/digconsummary/img1.png "Img 1"){: width="150%" height="150%" } <br /> [Source](https://blog.nature.org/2013/05/27/boucher-bird-blog-apps-smart-birder/)| Big data and related data collection tools such as acoustic sensors; machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms; dashboards and platforms for sharing data – these all constitute “digital conservation.” Digital technologies have the potential to make conservation more holistic, responsive, and participatory. Already, platforms such as eBird enlist the public in monitoring projects and there is an effort to “democratize” AI tools so that more conservation organizations can use them. Digital technologies may also provide precise data and, as a result, the ability to prioritize conserving the places that will most effectively meet nature protection goals like the Kunming-Montréal Global Biodiversity Framework’s 30% by 2030 target. |
+!["Img 1"](assets/img/digconsummary/img1.png "Img 1"){: width="150%" height="150%" }\ [Source](https://blog.nature.org/2013/05/27/boucher-bird-blog-apps-smart-birder/)| Big data and related data collection tools such as acoustic sensors; machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms; dashboards and platforms for sharing data – these all constitute “digital conservation.” Digital technologies have the potential to make conservation more holistic, responsive, and participatory. Already, platforms such as eBird enlist the public in monitoring projects and there is an effort to “democratize” AI tools so that more conservation organizations can use them. Digital technologies may also provide precise data and, as a result, the ability to prioritize conserving the places that will most effectively meet nature protection goals like the Kunming-Montréal Global Biodiversity Framework’s 30% by 2030 target.
 
-| We hear a lot about the promises of digital conservation and less about the challenges. Is access to digital conservation democratic? Are outcomes lining up with expectations? In general, what do conservationists actually think about and do with digital tools? | !["Img 2"](assets/img/digconsummary/img2.png "Img 2")<br /> [Source](https://cnr.ncsu.edu/news/2022/01/transforming-data-into-conservation/)|
+We hear a lot about the promises of digital conservation and less about the challenges. Is access to digital conservation democratic? Are outcomes lining up with expectations? In general, what do conservationists actually think about and do with digital tools?\ !["Img 2"](assets/img/digconsummary/img2.png "Img 2")\ [Source](https://cnr.ncsu.edu/news/2022/01/transforming-data-into-conservation/)|
 
 | !["Img 3"](assets/img/digconsummary/img3.png "Img 3"){: width="150%" height="150%" } <br /> [Source](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Online_Survey_Icon_or_logo.svg)| We conducted three surveys to understand practices and perspectives on digital conservation: 1) We counted and correlated keywords on conservation technology-related websites and the websites of 69 conservation organizations; 2) We conducted a more traditional survey of 45 organizations across Canada and the US on their use of conservation technologies, their goals in using them, and the outcomes they’ve seen; 3) We ran what’s known as a Q-method survey with 10 individuals in the sector to characterize distinct ways of thinking about digital conservation. Additionally, we explored a case study digital conservation project, interviewing five key informants and reviewing primary materials.|