Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[IND-519] bump cosmjs/stargate dependency version to 0.32.1 #886

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2023

Conversation

dydxwill
Copy link
Contributor

Changelist

bump stargate version of v4-proto to 0.32.1

Test Plan

Author/Reviewer Checklist

  • If this PR has changes that result in a different app state given the same prior state and transaction list, manually add the state-breaking label.
  • If the PR has breaking postgres changes to the indexer add the indexer-postgres-breaking label.
  • If this PR isn't state-breaking but has changes that modify behavior in PrepareProposal or ProcessProposal, manually add the label proposal-breaking.
  • If this PR is one of many that implement a specific feature, manually label them all feature:[feature-name].
  • If you wish to for mergify-bot to automatically create a PR to backport your change to a release branch, manually add the label backport/[branch-name].
  • Manually add any of the following labels: refactor, chore, bug.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the proto label Dec 12, 2023
@dydxwill dydxwill changed the title bump stargate version of v4-proto to 0.32.1 bump cosmjs/stargate dependency version to 0.32.1 Dec 12, 2023
@dydxwill dydxwill changed the title bump cosmjs/stargate dependency version to 0.32.1 [IND-519] bump cosmjs/stargate dependency version to 0.32.1 Dec 12, 2023
Copy link

linear bot commented Dec 12, 2023

@dydxwill dydxwill merged commit 35b87db into main Dec 12, 2023
9 checks passed
@dydxwill dydxwill deleted the wl/v4_proto_v branch December 12, 2023 18:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants