Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move off-chain-updates tests to its own package #1655

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

BrendanChou
Copy link
Contributor

@BrendanChou BrendanChou commented Jun 10, 2024

Changelist

  • Was getting error indexer/off_chain_updates/off_chain_updates.go:1: : import cycle not allowed in test while working on another pr. Moved test into a new package to fix the issue.
  • Make some off-chain-updates functions public to allow for testing
  • Fix a typo in the comments

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Renamed functions to follow a consistent naming convention for creating order update messages.
    • Updated test package and references to align with new naming conventions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes involve renaming several functions in the off_chain_updates.go file to follow a consistent naming convention with "New" as a prefix. Additionally, the package name in the corresponding test file was updated, and references within the test file were adjusted accordingly.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
protocol/indexer/off_chain_updates/off_chain_updates.go Renamed functions for creating order update messages to use "New" as a prefix for consistency.
protocol/indexer/off_chain_updates/off_chain_updates_test.go Updated package name to off_chain_updates_test and adjusted function references to match the new names in off_chain_updates.go.

Poem

In the land of code, where updates dance,
Functions renamed, a chance to enhance.
"New" they sing, with a fresh, clear tone,
Consistency found, in every zone.
Tests align, in harmony's quest,
Orderly changes, we code our best.
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a8e4c7 and bae7dec.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • protocol/indexer/off_chain_updates/off_chain_updates.go (8 hunks)
  • protocol/indexer/off_chain_updates/off_chain_updates_test.go (15 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • protocol/indexer/off_chain_updates/off_chain_updates_test.go
Additional comments not posted (3)
protocol/indexer/off_chain_updates/off_chain_updates.go (3)

Line range hint 287-308: Review the implementation of NewOrderPlaceMessage.

The implementation of NewOrderPlaceMessage looks correct and follows the expected structure for creating an OffChainUpdate struct. The use of proto.Marshal is appropriate for encoding the structure into a byte slice.


Line range hint 305-329: Review the implementation of NewOrderRemoveMessage.

The function NewOrderRemoveMessage is implemented correctly. It properly constructs the OffChainUpdate struct and handles the marshaling process. Good use of structured logging and error handling within the function.


Line range hint 329-345: Review the implementation of NewOrderUpdateMessage.

The implementation of NewOrderUpdateMessage is correct. It effectively creates an OffChainUpdate struct and encodes it as a byte slice using proto.Marshal. The function parameters are used appropriately to construct the message.

@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ func CreateOrderPlaceMessage(
return msgsender.Message{}, false
}

update, err := newOrderPlaceMessage(order)
update, err := NewOrderPlaceMessage(order)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure proper error handling in NewOrderPlaceMessage.

The function NewOrderPlaceMessage is called without handling its error return value. This could lead to unhandled exceptions or incorrect behavior in case of an error. Consider adding error handling here.

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
return msgsender.Message{}, false
}

update, err := newOrderReplaceMessage(order)
update, err := NewOrderReplaceMessage(order)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure proper error handling in NewOrderReplaceMessage.

Similar to the previous comment, the error returned by NewOrderReplaceMessage is not handled. Proper error handling is crucial to ensure the robustness of the application.

@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@
return msgsender.Message{}, false
}

update, err := newOrderUpdateMessage(orderId, totalFilled)
update, err := NewOrderUpdateMessage(orderId, totalFilled)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure proper error handling in NewOrderUpdateMessage.

The function NewOrderUpdateMessage is invoked here without handling its error return value. It's important to handle all potential errors to prevent runtime issues.

@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
return msgsender.Message{}, false
}

update, err := newOrderRemoveMessage(orderId, reason, removalStatus)
update, err := NewOrderRemoveMessage(orderId, reason, removalStatus)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure proper error handling in NewOrderRemoveMessage.

The error returned by NewOrderRemoveMessage is not handled in this context. Handling errors appropriately is essential for maintaining the integrity of the application's operations.

@BrendanChou BrendanChou merged commit bf90e52 into main Jun 10, 2024
17 of 18 checks passed
@BrendanChou BrendanChou deleted the bc/fix-ocu-test branch June 10, 2024 17:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants