Update table

_posts/2025-03-03-diode-collab-vs-discord-slack-teams.md

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ If you share sensitive information, we argue that you should not trust platforms
 
 ### How do they compare to Diode Collab for team collaboration?
 
-<table><tbody><tr><td>Feature</td><td>Slack</td><td>Discord</td><td>Diode</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decentralization &amp; Censorship Resistance</strong></td><td>Centralized platform controlled by Slack’s policies. Access can be restricted or suspended based on geopolitical regulations or internal decisions.</td><td>Centralized, with the company enforcing bans and censorship on users or entire communities. Subject to platform-imposed restrictions.</td><td>Decentralized infrastructure with no central authority, ensuring communication is resistant to censorship, and no single entity can control or block access.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Ownership &amp; Control</strong></td><td>Stores all messages and files on centralized servers, giving Slack control over user data. Potential for data analysis and monetization.</td><td>User data stored on centralized servers, allowing Discord access to messages and files, with minimal control for users over data storage.</td><td>Users retain full control of data, with self-hosting options or decentralized storage, ensuring data privacy and preventing third-party access or exploitation.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Offline Access &amp; Resiliency</strong></td><td>Dependent on cloud infrastructure, vulnerable to disruptions, outages, or internet censorship, which can affect access to communications.</td><td>Relies on cloud infrastructure, so if the platform goes down, users lose access to essential communication tools and messages.</td><td>Peer-to-peer network ensures communication remains functional even in low-bandwidth or disconnected environments, providing resiliency during outages or cyber threats.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>The Future of Secure Business Communication</strong></td><td>While a popular collaboration tool, its reliance on centralized servers, lack of end-to-end encryption, and vulnerability to censorship make it less future-proof for businesses prioritizing privacy.</td><td>Primarily designed for gaming communities, Discord lacks security features like end-to-end encryption and decentralization, limiting its long-term viability for secure business communication.</td><td>A solution with end-to-end encryption, decentralization, and resistance to censorship. Diode ensures secure, private, and uninterrupted communication, empowering businesses to maintain full control over their data as digital security concerns grow.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Use Cases &amp; Best Fit</strong></td><td>Best for workplace collaboration, project management, and team communication. Offers integrations with productivity tools but lacks strong security for sensitive data.</td><td>Designed for gaming and community engagement but often used for casual team collaboration. Lacks enterprise security features, making it unsuitable for confidential business communication.</td><td>Ideal for businesses needing secure, private, and resilient communication. Perfect for teams handling sensitive data, remote teams in restricted environments, and organizations requiring decentralized, censorship-resistant collaboration.</td></tr></tbody></table>
+<table><tbody><tr><td>Feature</td><td>Slack</td><td>Discord</td><td>Diode</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Decentralization &amp; Censorship Resistance</strong></td><td><ul><li>Centralized platform controlled by Slack’s policies</li><li>Access can be restricted or suspended based on geopolitical regulations or internal decisions</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Centralized platform with company-enforced bans and censorship</li><li>Subject to platform-imposed restrictions</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Decentralized infrastructure with no central authority</li><li>Communication resistant to censorship</li><li>No single entity can control or block access</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data Ownership &amp; Control</strong></td><td><ul><li>Stores all messages and files on centralized servers</li><li>Slack controls user data with potential for data analysis and monetization</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>User data stored on centralized servers</li><li>Discord has access to messages and files</li><li>Minimal user control over data storage</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Users retain full control of data</li><li>Self-hosting options or decentralized storage</li><li>Ensures data privacy and prevents third-party access or exploitation</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Offline Access &amp; Resiliency</strong></td><td><ul><li>Dependent on cloud infrastructure</li><li>Vulnerable to disruptions, outages, or internet censorship</li><li>Access to communications can be affected</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Relies on cloud infrastructure</li><li>Platform outages result in loss of access to communication tools and messages</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Peer-to-peer network</li><li>Remains functional in low-bandwidth or disconnected environments</li><li>Provides resiliency during outages or cyber threats</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td><strong>The Future of Secure Business Communication</strong></td><td><ul><li>Popular collaboration tool</li><li>Relies on centralized servers</li><li>Lacks end-to-end encryption</li><li>Vulnerable to censorship</li><li>Less future-proof for privacy-focused businesses</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Designed primarily for gaming communities</li><li>Lacks end-to-end encryption</li><li>Centralized infrastructure</li><li>Limited long-term viability for secure business communication</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>End-to-end encryption</li><li>Decentralized infrastructure</li><li>Censorship-resistant</li><li>Ensures secure, private, and uninterrupted communication</li><li>Gives businesses full control over their data amid growing digital security concerns</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Use Cases &amp; Best Fit</strong></td><td><ul><li>Best for workplace collaboration, project management, and team communication</li><li>Offers integrations with productivity tools</li><li>Lacks strong security for sensitive data</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Designed for gaming and community engagement</li><li>Used for casual team collaboration</li><li>Lacks enterprise security features</li><li>Unsuitable for confidential business communication</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Ideal for businesses needing secure, private, and resilient communication</li><li>Suited for teams handling sensitive data</li><li>Supports remote teams in restricted environments</li><li>Enables decentralized, censorship-resistant collaboration</li></ul></td></tr></tbody></table>
 
 #### Conclusion: