Operator precedence 2

[Normand-1024]

Several changes that I think you should know:

[:compare :compare] cases such as a < b > 1 is now considered not-confusing, mostly due to the false positive case that you sent me. I don't really know any way around it other than this. Plus I think [:compare :compare] has a mixtures of confusing (a <= b != 2) and not confusing (a == b != 1) combinations in it. So I don't feel too bad underclassifying this.

Any confusing combination involving ternary operator will now only concerns itself with the first operand. So a && b ? c : d is considered confusing while a ? b && c : d is not.

[dgopstein]

1. Please uncommit src/test/resources/i386.c
2. Please update the comment on that one function that I don't understand (there are also a couple other typos if you want to fix those, but its up to you)

Otherwise looks really good

[dgopstein]

I don't understand what this function does. Can you add some more description to the docstring?

[dgopstein]

Or maybe a better name too? I'm not really sure.

[dgopstein]

Perfect! Thank you.