Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update sorbet ignore list with new ecosystems #11494

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

JamieMagee
Copy link
Contributor

What are you trying to accomplish?

Update the Sorbet ignore list with the new ecosystems created since the last Sorbet config update.

Anything you want to highlight for special attention from reviewers?

How will you know you've accomplished your goal?

These files are omitted from the Sorbet reports.

Checklist

  • I have run the complete test suite to ensure all tests and linters pass.
  • I have thoroughly tested my code changes to ensure they work as expected, including adding additional tests for new functionality.
  • I have written clear and descriptive commit messages.
  • I have provided a detailed description of the changes in the pull request, including the problem it addresses, how it fixes the problem, and any relevant details about the implementation.
  • I have ensured that the code is well-documented and easy to understand.

@JamieMagee JamieMagee requested a review from a team as a code owner February 5, 2025 18:16
@JamieMagee JamieMagee added the sorbet 🍦 Relates to Sorbet types label Feb 5, 2025
@sachin-sandhu sachin-sandhu force-pushed the jamiemagee/sorbet-ignore branch from df2d578 to 61736be Compare February 6, 2025 03:48
@sachin-sandhu sachin-sandhu merged commit 28cbc74 into main Feb 6, 2025
54 checks passed
@sachin-sandhu sachin-sandhu deleted the jamiemagee/sorbet-ignore branch February 6, 2025 04:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sorbet 🍦 Relates to Sorbet types
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants