Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: DH-18395: Address performance problems with large numbers of table locations caused by serial unmanage #6552

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

rcaudy
Copy link
Member

@rcaudy rcaudy commented Jan 13, 2025

Note that the supplied "unit test" is maybe not suitable for commit.

…age all buffered locations individually, as this is much more expensive than simply dropping all of them.

* Fix TableLocationSubscriptionBuffer bug in add/remove validation.
* Fix TableBackedTableLocationProvider to set callsite for instrumentation, so that many table ops in a tight loop are no longer quite so expensive.
@rcaudy rcaudy added this to the 0.37.3 milestone Jan 13, 2025
@rcaudy rcaudy requested review from lbooker42 and cpwright January 13, 2025 01:57
@rcaudy rcaudy self-assigned this Jan 13, 2025
@rcaudy rcaudy changed the title Address performance problems with large numbers of table locations caused by serial unmanage fix: Address performance problems with large numbers of table locations caused by serial unmanage Jan 13, 2025
@rcaudy rcaudy changed the title fix: Address performance problems with large numbers of table locations caused by serial unmanage fix: DH-18395: Address performance problems with large numbers of table locations caused by serial unmanage Jan 13, 2025
@rcaudy rcaudy merged commit 75187f9 into deephaven:main Jan 13, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
@rcaudy rcaudy deleted the rwc-prefiltertlks branch January 13, 2025 16:03
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 13, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants