You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey team, we have been discussing there being rules for how a plugin project should look for it to be added to the hub. Here's what I've got so far:
has a dbt_project.yml with a name
if packages.yml exists, it lives at the root dir of the package
the package repo should not be private
prefer main to master for parsing out commits (perhaps have a way for packages to specify the branch of their choice)
Note: I had originally framed this to myself as requiring a main branch, but on second thought, I think it's better to prioritize main to master in the script logic or perhaps even just having some kind of config file in the user package repo's as a possible override if they want to specify the exact branch for us to use when considering new versions. main is already prioritized by GitHub and we can document that master has been deprecated but is still supported (since any branch can be used). That way, we don't frustrate package maintainers that haven't yet made the switch (plenty of shops are still slowly but surely transitioning over).
What other things should be added to docs about what a basic package should look like?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey team, we have been discussing there being rules for how a plugin project should look for it to be added to the hub. Here's what I've got so far:
Note: I had originally framed this to myself as requiring a
main
branch, but on second thought, I think it's better to prioritize main to master in the script logic or perhaps even just having some kind of config file in the user package repo's as a possible override if they want to specify the exact branch for us to use when considering new versions.main
is already prioritized by GitHub and we can document thatmaster
has been deprecated but is still supported (since any branch can be used). That way, we don't frustrate package maintainers that haven't yet made the switch (plenty of shops are still slowly but surely transitioning over).What other things should be added to docs about what a basic package should look like?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: