Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

downgrade model #219

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025
Merged

downgrade model #219

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

dachosen1
Copy link
Owner

@dachosen1 dachosen1 commented Dec 21, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the default AI model from "gpt-4" to "gpt-3.5" for generating responses.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected the list of valid roles, though an incorrect role is still included in the options.
    • Adjusted error messages to align with the new valid role options.
  • Chores

    • Updated the version of the openai package from 1.30.3 to 1.58.1.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the generate_response function in the nearquake/open_ai_client.py file by changing the default model parameter from "gpt-4" to "gpt-3.5". Additionally, the list of valid roles has been updated to incorrectly include "role" instead of the intended valid roles. The error message for invalid roles has also been adjusted accordingly. The requirements.txt file reflects an update in the version of the openai package from 1.30.3 to 1.58.1.

Changes

File Change Summary
nearquake/open_ai_client.py - Default model changed from "gpt-4" to "gpt-3.5"
- Updated list of valid roles with an incorrect entry
- Modified error message for invalid roles
requirements.txt - Dependency version updated from openai==1.30.3 to openai==1.58.1

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Model Swap 🤖

From GPT-4 to 3.5 we leap,
A tiny change, no need to weep!
Our AI friend shifts gear with grace,
A model switch at steady pace.
Code hops along, no drama here! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f5d9157 and 403b15c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • requirements.txt (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • requirements.txt

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

what-the-diff bot commented Dec 21, 2024

PR Summary

  • Model Parameter Updated in generate_response Function
    The default model parameter for our key function named generate_response has been updated. Instead of using "gpt-4", we are now using "gpt-3.5". This change affects how our system generates responses.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
nearquake/open_ai_client.py (2)

Line range hint 21-21: Fix incorrect valid roles list.

The valid roles list contains "role" which appears to be incorrect. The standard OpenAI chat roles are "user", "system", and "assistant".

-    valid_roles = ["role", "user"]
+    valid_roles = ["user", "system", "assistant"]

Line range hint 23-24: Update error message to reflect correct valid roles.

The error messages should be updated to reflect the correct set of valid roles.

-        _logger.error(f"Invalid role: {role}. Valid options are 'role' and 'user'.")
-        raise ValueError("Error: Invalid role. Please choose 'role' or 'user'.")
+        _logger.error(f"Invalid role: {role}. Valid options are 'user', 'system', and 'assistant'.")
+        raise ValueError("Error: Invalid role. Please choose 'user', 'system', or 'assistant'.")
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
nearquake/open_ai_client.py (2)

11-11: Model parameter default value doesn't match docstring.

The default model has been changed to "gpt-3.5", but the docstring still states "defaults to gpt-4". Please update the docstring to reflect the new default value.

-    :param model: Type of GPT model to use, defaults to gpt-4
+    :param model: Type of GPT model to use, defaults to gpt-3.5

Line range hint 40-40: Fix typo in error logging.

There's a typo in the error logging message ("Unexepected" should be "Unexpected").

-        _logger.error(f"Unexepected error occured {e}")
+        _logger.error(f"Unexpected error occurred {e}")
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a79b945 and f5d9157.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • nearquake/open_ai_client.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
nearquake/open_ai_client.py (1)

Line range hint 11-42: Verify the impact of model downgrade.

While downgrading from GPT-4 to GPT-3.5 might improve performance and reduce costs, it's important to verify that this change won't negatively impact the application's functionality.

Run the following script to understand the usage patterns and potential impact:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about how the model is being used in the codebase.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

Model downgrade impact appears minimal and safe

The codebase shows that:

  • The model is only used in generate_response() function with a single caller in main.py
  • No model-specific logic or features are being used that would require GPT-4's capabilities
  • The function is used to generate earthquake facts and alerts, which GPT-3.5 is capable of handling
  • No tests specifically verify model behavior or output quality
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any model-specific logic or configurations that might be affected

# Check for any model-specific configurations or environment variables
rg -l "gpt-4|gpt-3.5" 

# Look for any performance or capability requirements in documentation
fd -t f "README|CONTRIBUTING|ARCHITECTURE" -X cat {}

Length of output: 1143


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any model-specific parameters or configurations in function calls
rg -A 3 "generate_response\(" 

# Look for any test files that might verify model behavior
fd -t f "test.*\.py" -X cat {}

# Check for any environment variables or configuration files that might specify the model
rg -l "OPENAI|GPT" 

Length of output: 5349

@dachosen1 dachosen1 merged commit b4bf75c into master Jan 9, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant