-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
downgrade model #219
downgrade model #219
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
PR Summary
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
nearquake/open_ai_client.py (2)
Line range hint
21-21
: Fix incorrect valid roles list.The valid roles list contains "role" which appears to be incorrect. The standard OpenAI chat roles are "user", "system", and "assistant".
- valid_roles = ["role", "user"] + valid_roles = ["user", "system", "assistant"]
Line range hint
23-24
: Update error message to reflect correct valid roles.The error messages should be updated to reflect the correct set of valid roles.
- _logger.error(f"Invalid role: {role}. Valid options are 'role' and 'user'.") - raise ValueError("Error: Invalid role. Please choose 'role' or 'user'.") + _logger.error(f"Invalid role: {role}. Valid options are 'user', 'system', and 'assistant'.") + raise ValueError("Error: Invalid role. Please choose 'user', 'system', or 'assistant'.")
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
nearquake/open_ai_client.py (2)
11-11
: Model parameter default value doesn't match docstring.The default model has been changed to "gpt-3.5", but the docstring still states "defaults to gpt-4". Please update the docstring to reflect the new default value.
- :param model: Type of GPT model to use, defaults to gpt-4 + :param model: Type of GPT model to use, defaults to gpt-3.5
Line range hint
40-40
: Fix typo in error logging.There's a typo in the error logging message ("Unexepected" should be "Unexpected").
- _logger.error(f"Unexepected error occured {e}") + _logger.error(f"Unexpected error occurred {e}")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
nearquake/open_ai_client.py
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
nearquake/open_ai_client.py (1)
Line range hint 11-42
: Verify the impact of model downgrade.
While downgrading from GPT-4 to GPT-3.5 might improve performance and reduce costs, it's important to verify that this change won't negatively impact the application's functionality.
Run the following script to understand the usage patterns and potential impact:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about how the model is being used in the codebase.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Model downgrade impact appears minimal and safe
The codebase shows that:
- The model is only used in
generate_response()
function with a single caller inmain.py
- No model-specific logic or features are being used that would require GPT-4's capabilities
- The function is used to generate earthquake facts and alerts, which GPT-3.5 is capable of handling
- No tests specifically verify model behavior or output quality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any model-specific logic or configurations that might be affected
# Check for any model-specific configurations or environment variables
rg -l "gpt-4|gpt-3.5"
# Look for any performance or capability requirements in documentation
fd -t f "README|CONTRIBUTING|ARCHITECTURE" -X cat {}
Length of output: 1143
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any model-specific parameters or configurations in function calls
rg -A 3 "generate_response\("
# Look for any test files that might verify model behavior
fd -t f "test.*\.py" -X cat {}
# Check for any environment variables or configuration files that might specify the model
rg -l "OPENAI|GPT"
Length of output: 5349
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
openai
package from1.30.3
to1.58.1
.