-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Post tweet error #213
Post tweet error #213
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
PR Summary
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
nearquake/data_processor.py (2)
322-322
: Add method parameter documentation.Consider adding a docstring to document the parameters for better maintainability.
def upload(self): + """ + Upload and tweet eligible earthquake events. + + This method extracts eligible earthquake events and posts them to Twitter using + the TweetOperator's run_tweet_operator method. + """
Line range hint
322-326
: Consider enhancing error handling for tweet operations.The current error handling could be improved to:
- Include more specific error information in the log message
- Add retry logic for transient failures
- Handle database cleanup for failed tweets
- try: - self.run_tweet_operator(tweet_text=tweet_text, conn=self.conn) - _logger.info( - "Recorded recent tweet posted in the database recent into the Database " - ) - except Exception as e: - _logger.error( - f"Encountered an error while attempting to post {tweet_text}. {e} " - ) + max_retries = 3 + retry_count = 0 + while retry_count < max_retries: + try: + self.run_tweet_operator(tweet_text=tweet_text, conn=self.conn) + _logger.info( + f"Successfully posted and recorded tweet for event {quake.id_event}" + ) + break + except Exception as e: + retry_count += 1 + _logger.error( + f"Attempt {retry_count}/{max_retries} failed while posting tweet " + f"for event {quake.id_event}. Error: {type(e).__name__}: {str(e)}" + ) + if retry_count == max_retries: + # Consider adding cleanup code here if needed + _logger.error(f"Failed to post tweet after {max_retries} attempts")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
main.py
(0 hunks)nearquake/data_processor.py
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- main.py
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ def upload(self): | |||
) | |||
|
|||
try: | |||
self.post_tweet(tweet_text=tweet_text, conn=self.conn) | |||
self.run_tweet_operator(tweet_text=tweet_text, conn=self.conn) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Type Error: Parameter type mismatch in run_tweet_operator call
The run_tweet_operator
method in TweetOperator expects tweet_text
parameter to be a dictionary (tweet_text: dict
), but in data_processor.py it's being called with a string value. This type mismatch could cause runtime errors.
- In
nearquake/tweet_processor.py:run_tweet_operator()
: Parameter istweet_text: dict
- In
nearquake/data_processor.py
: Called withtweet_text
as string
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify parent class implementation.
The change to use run_tweet_operator
from the parent TweetOperator class is a good architectural decision as it centralizes the tweet posting logic. However, let's verify the implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the TweetOperator.run_tweet_operator method exists with correct signature
ast-grep --pattern 'class TweetOperator {
$$$
run_tweet_operator(tweet_text: str, conn: Session) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for TweetOperator class and its methods
rg -A 10 "class TweetOperator"
# Also search for run_tweet_operator method definition
rg -A 5 "def run_tweet_operator"
# Search for any tweet-related operator files
fd -t f "tweet.*\.py$"
Length of output: 1185
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the full implementation of run_tweet_operator to verify the signature mismatch
rg -B 2 -A 10 "def run_tweet_operator" nearquake/tweet_processor.py
# Also check the inheritance hierarchy in data_processor.py
rg "class TweetEarthquakeEvents" -A 3 nearquake/data_processor.py
Length of output: 747
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor