Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CoW AMM info #442

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 27, 2025
Merged

Add CoW AMM info #442

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 27, 2025

Conversation

bram-vdberg
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR adds a short description about integrating CoW AMM's for solvers. It also adds the CoW AMM factory contracts for Arbitrum and Base.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 6, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 21, 2025 3:57pm

@bram-vdberg bram-vdberg changed the title Add co w am ms Add CoW AMM info Jan 6, 2025
@bram-vdberg bram-vdberg marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2025 12:22
@bram-vdberg bram-vdberg requested a review from a team as a code owner January 9, 2025 12:22
@cowmarketing
Copy link
Contributor

@bram-vdberg since we literally just launched CoW AMM on Base (as of one hour ago https://x.com/CoWSwap/status/1877339637171237354) shouldn't we add the info for Base? or is not ready yet?

@acanidio-econ acanidio-econ enabled auto-merge (squash) January 27, 2025 08:55
auto-merge was automatically disabled January 27, 2025 08:57

Pull request was closed

@acanidio-econ acanidio-econ reopened this Jan 27, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 27, 2025
@acanidio-econ acanidio-econ merged commit dd7fff3 into main Jan 27, 2025
5 checks passed
@acanidio-econ acanidio-econ deleted the Add-CoW-AMMs branch January 27, 2025 08:59
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants