-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move solve
to OptimalControl.jl
#175
Comments
I agree that we should have the top-level I'll start two branches and see how it goes. |
If both solve methods extends the one from commonsolve it will not interfere i think. We can keep the name solve for the resolution of a docp. Thanks to multiple dispatxh it will be ok. |
Ok, branches for the first draft are up.
|
Ok, I think I got the export for I probably misunderstood what you said about |
Another small improvement: there is now an error message when trying to call solve without 'using NLPModelsIpopt' beforehand @ocots @jbcaillau These should fix the current problems with |
I propose to move the
solve
function toOptimalControl.jl
.We have to merge
CTDirect.jl/ext/CTSolveExt.jl
Line 69 in 1c0e2c6
with
https://github.com/control-toolbox/OptimalControl.jl/blob/d139ce5cfc9c59be2e339a6045a5e1654fde2573/src/solve.jl#L67
Note that for the moment, even if in
CTDirect.jl
thesolve
function extends the one fromCommonSolve.jl
we still have the problem of qualifying forOptimalControl .jl
. I think it would better to have only one commonsolve
for anOptimalControlModel
. InCTDirect.jl
, we can keep thesolve
of aDOCP
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: