Add memory to codebuild #772
Conversation
|
@NiallJoeMaher is attempting to deploy a commit to the Codú Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe recent updates focus on refining the CDK application's functionality. Changes include adjustments to element visibility checks in end-to-end tests, button text enhancements for a smoother user experience, and browser configuration refinements for improved testing coverage. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- cdk/lib/pipeline-stack.ts (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
cdk/lib/pipeline-stack.ts (2)
- 22-22: The addition of the
codebuildimport statement is correctly implemented and follows best practices for importing modules in TypeScript. This import is necessary for the subsequent use ofcodebuild.ComputeType.MEDIUMin thebuildEnvironmentconfiguration.- 54-54: The update to the
buildEnvironmentconfiguration to usecomputeType: codebuild.ComputeType.MEDIUMis a targeted change aimed at addressing build issues by allocating more memory to the build process. This change is well-implemented within the context of the AWS CDK and follows best practices for configuring AWS CodeBuild environments in CDK applications. However, it's important to monitor the impact of this change on build times and costs, as higher compute types can lead to increased AWS charges.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- e2e/articles.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- e2e/login.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- playwright.config.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
e2e/articles.spec.ts (1)
- 21-21: The expectation for the
.animate-pulseelement has been changed from being visible to being hidden. This is a significant change in the test's logic. Can you confirm if this change aligns with the updated UI behavior? Additionally, it seems the old expectation (toBeVisible()) is still present just before the new one. Was it intended to be replaced, or is this an oversight?e2e/login.spec.ts (2)
- 17-17: The button text has been updated to "Login with GitHub". Please confirm this change accurately reflects the current UI text for the login button.
- 32-33: The element selection logic for the login field has been modified. While this change seems to aim for more precise test conditions, can you confirm it aligns with the current UI structure and does not introduce brittleness to the test?
playwright.config.ts (1)
- 40-55: The configurations for Firefox and Safari have been commented out, and a new configuration for Mobile Chrome using the Pixel 5 device has been added. Can you clarify the rationale behind these changes? Specifically, how does this impact the overall test coverage, and what led to the focus on Mobile Chrome at the expense of Firefox and Safari testing?
.github/workflows/playwright.yml
Outdated
| NEXTAUTH_URL: http://localhost:3000/api/auth | ||
| NEXTAUTH_SECRET: ${{ secrets.NEXTAUTH_SECRET }} | ||
| GITHUB_ID: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_ID }} | ||
| GITHUB_SECRET: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_SECRET }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The addition of environment variables NEXTAUTH_URL, NEXTAUTH_SECRET, GITHUB_ID, and GITHUB_SECRET is a good practice for ensuring that your Playwright tests have access to necessary configurations and secrets. However, it's crucial to ensure that the secrets (NEXTAUTH_SECRET, GITHUB_ID, GITHUB_SECRET) are properly set up in the repository's secrets to avoid runtime errors. Additionally, consider if there are any security implications of exposing NEXTAUTH_URL directly in the workflow file. If this URL is sensitive or environment-specific, you might want to move it to the repository's secrets as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/playwright.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/playwright.yml
✨ Codu Pull Request 💻
Pull Request details
Any Breaking changes
Summary by CodeRabbit