Added info on symbolic tokens in design docs #2657
Conversation
|
@geoffromer As you said I will make the table into one row to be more concise. But the problem is I am confused about which doc I should refer to update the list. The explorer's lexer list or toolchain's lexer definition or any other?? |
|
@aswin2108 I think we should update the list based on the other documents in |
|
This looks good to me. Ideally I'd prefer for this comment to be addressed, but that's a minor issue. I'm leaving approval to @josh11b since he had requested changes. |
|
@geoffromer I didn't understand that actually! From my understanding I made the previous version of the table, but at that time you said some separators were missing so I thought you wanted it this way! Can you give me an example? I will update it. |
|
This looks good to me. |
With this change `docs/design/lexical_conventions/symbolic_tokens.md` should now include all operators and symbols from accepted proposals.
The Operators proposal #601 got accepted and but the details were not updated in the design docs. Added
symbolic_tokens.mdfile to add the details of the proposal and its discussion.Closes #1992