Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Rust crate base64 to 0.22 #114

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 6, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
base64 dependencies minor 0.21 -> 0.22

Release Notes

marshallpierce/rust-base64 (base64)

v0.22.1

Compare Source

  • Correct the symbols used for the predefined alphabet::BIN_HEX.

v0.22.0

Compare Source

  • DecodeSliceError::OutputSliceTooSmall is now conservative rather than precise. That is, the error will only occur if the decoded output cannot fit, meaning that Engine::decode_slice can now be used with exactly-sized output slices. As part of this, Engine::internal_decode now returns DecodeSliceError instead of DecodeError, but that is not expected to affect any external callers.
  • DecodeError::InvalidLength now refers specifically to the number of valid symbols being invalid (i.e. len % 4 == 1), rather than just the number of input bytes. This avoids confusing scenarios when based on interpretation you could make a case for either InvalidLength or InvalidByte being appropriate.
  • Decoding is somewhat faster (5-10%)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "* 0-4 * * 3" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Mar 6, 2024

⚠ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update artifacts related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: misc/test-client/Cargo.lock
Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path misc/test-client/Cargo.toml --package [email protected] --precise 0.22.1
    Updating crates.io index
error: failed to select a version for the requirement `base64 = "^0.21"`
candidate versions found which didn't match: 0.22.1
location searched: crates.io index
required by package `reqwest v0.11.22`
    ... which satisfies dependency `reqwest = "^0.11"` (locked to 0.11.22) of package `test-client v0.1.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/brave/constellation-processors/misc/test-client)`
perhaps a crate was updated and forgotten to be re-vendored?

File name: Cargo.lock
Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path Cargo.toml --package [email protected] --precise 0.22.1
    Updating crates.io index
error: failed to select a version for the requirement `base64 = "^0.21"`
candidate versions found which didn't match: 0.22.1
location searched: crates.io index
required by package `reqwest v0.11.27`
    ... which satisfies dependency `reqwest = "^0.11"` (locked to 0.11.27) of package `constellation-processors v1.1.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/brave/constellation-processors)`
perhaps a crate was updated and forgotten to be re-vendored?

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 6, 2024 04:41
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/base64-0.x branch from 167d68c to 8dcdfc5 Compare March 8, 2024 04:11
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/base64-0.x branch from 8dcdfc5 to 0717dd4 Compare May 1, 2024 10:29
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update Rust crate base64 to 0.22 Update Rust crate base64 to 0.22.1 May 1, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/base64-0.x branch from 0717dd4 to 725b5aa Compare May 5, 2024 09:49
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update Rust crate base64 to 0.22.1 Update Rust crate base64 to 0.22 May 5, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/base64-0.x branch from 725b5aa to 0f7a13b Compare July 3, 2024 00:16
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jul 3, 2024

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock
Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path Cargo.toml --package [email protected] --precise 0.22.1
    Updating crates.io index
error: failed to select a version for the requirement `base64 = "^0.21"`
candidate versions found which didn't match: 0.22.1
location searched: crates.io index
required by package `reqwest v0.11.27`
    ... which satisfies dependency `reqwest = "^0.11"` (locked to 0.11.27) of package `constellation-processors v1.1.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/brave/constellation-processors)`
perhaps a crate was updated and forgotten to be re-vendored?

@DJAndries DJAndries force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 82d2bb6 to 3b7889f Compare November 15, 2024 04:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants