Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update dependencies, fix sass build deprated warnings, upgrade to mod… #96

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mohammadbaghaei
Copy link

@mohammadbaghaei mohammadbaghaei commented Feb 5, 2025

…ern javascript and sass syntax, optimize bundle size and overall performance

Summary by Sourcery

Update project dependencies, fix deprecated SASS build warnings, and upgrade to modern JavaScript and SASS syntax. Optimize for bundle size and overall performance.

New Features:

  • Add support for extra content in dropdown items using the data-extra attribute.
  • Implement placeholder, search text, and selected text customization through attributes or configuration options.

Enhancements:

  • Refactor event triggering logic in nice-select2.js for better code organization and maintainability.
  • Improve the NiceSelect class by adding input validation, default options for placeholder, search text, and selected text.
  • Add a new update method to the NiceSelect class to refresh the dropdown when the original select element changes.
  • Add new methods setValue, getValue, updateSelectValue, and resetSelectValue to provide better control over select element values.
  • Implement a search feature within the dropdown with enhanced keyboard navigation.

Tests:

  • Add tests for new features and methods.

…ern javascript and sass syntax, optimize bundle size and overall performance
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the Nice Select 2 library to use modern JavaScript syntax, improves performance, and adds new features. The changes include refactoring the event triggering logic, adding new options, and updating dependencies.

Sequence diagram for the new event handling system

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant NiceSelect
    participant EventSystem
    participant DOM

    User->>NiceSelect: Interact with dropdown
    NiceSelect->>EventSystem: triggerEvent(element, type, init)
    Note over EventSystem: Unified event handling
    EventSystem->>DOM: Create appropriate event
    alt Click Event
        EventSystem->>DOM: new MouseEvent
    else Change Event
        EventSystem->>DOM: new Event
    else Focus Event
        EventSystem->>DOM: new FocusEvent
    else UI Event
        EventSystem->>DOM: new UIEvent
    end
    DOM-->>NiceSelect: Event dispatched
    NiceSelect-->>User: Update UI
Loading

Class diagram showing the updated NiceSelect class structure

classDiagram
    class NiceSelect {
        -el: Element
        -config: Object
        -data: Array
        -selectedOptions: Array
        -placeholder: string
        -searchtext: string
        -selectedtext: string
        -dropdown: Element
        -multiple: boolean
        -disabled: boolean
        +constructor(element, options)
        +create()
        +processData(data)
        +extractData()
        +renderDropdown()
        -_renderSelectedItems()
        -_renderItems()
        -_renderItem(option)
        -_renderItemExtra(content)
        +update()
        +disable()
        +enable()
        +clear()
        +destroy()
        +bindEvent()
        -_bindSearchEvent()
        -_onClicked(e)
        -_onItemClicked(option, e)
        +setValue(value)
        +getValue()
        +updateSelectValue()
        +resetSelectValue()
        -_onClickedOutside(e)
        -_onKeyPressed(e)
        -_findNext(el)
        -_findPrev(el)
        -_onSearchChanged(e)
        -_triggerValidationMessage(type)
    }
    note for NiceSelect "Refactored to use modern JS class syntax
and improved event handling"
Loading

State diagram for the dropdown component

stateDiagram-v2
    [*] --> Closed
    Closed --> Open: click/keypress
    Open --> Closed: click outside/escape

    state Open {
        [*] --> Normal
        Normal --> Searching: type in search
        Searching --> Normal: clear search
        Normal --> Selected: click option
        Selected --> Normal: clear selection
    }

    Open --> Invalid: validation fails
    Invalid --> Open: fix validation

    state Closed {
        [*] --> Enabled
        Enabled --> Disabled: disable()
        Disabled --> Enabled: enable()
    }
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Refactor event triggering logic to use a single function.
  • Replaced individual trigger functions with a single triggerEvent function.
  • Updated event listeners to use the new triggerEvent function.
src/js/nice-select2.js
Update project dependencies and upgrade to modern JavaScript and SASS syntax.
  • Updated dependencies in package.json.
  • Configured webpack to use source maps.
  • Updated SASS syntax to use @use instead of @import.
  • Removed deprecated SASS functions.
package.json
webpack.config.js
src/scss/nice-select2.scss
src/scss/style.scss
Add new features such as default placeholder, search text, and selected text options.
  • Added default placeholder, searchtext, and selectedtext options to the defaultOptions object.
  • Updated the constructor to use the new options.
  • Added a public clear() method to reset the selected options.
  • Added support for the data-extra attribute on options.
  • Added validation message triggers for invalid selections.
src/js/nice-select2.js
Optimize bundle size and overall performance.
  • Replaced utility functions with concise alternatives.
  • Used more efficient DOM manipulation methods.
  • Removed unused code.
src/js/nice-select2.js

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @mohammadbaghaei - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider keeping source maps for production debugging - while removing them reduces bundle size, it makes troubleshooting production issues significantly more difficult
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@mohammadbaghaei
Copy link
Author

@sourcery-ai review

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @mohammadbaghaei - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider breaking down large pull requests into smaller, more focused ones for easier review.
  • Ensure comprehensive test coverage for all new features and changes.
  • Re-evaluate the decision to remove source maps, as it may impact debugging capabilities.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@mohammadbaghaei
Copy link
Author

@sourcery-ai review

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @mohammadbaghaei - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the public API methods and important class properties. This will help with maintainability and IDE integration.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 2 issues found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

},
devtool: "source-map",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (performance): Consider using 'eval-source-map' for development and 'source-map' for production

Different source map types can significantly impact build time and debugging experience. Using 'eval-source-map' in development would improve build speed while maintaining good debugging capabilities.

Suggested implementation:

  devtool: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' ? 'source-map' : 'eval-source-map',

To fully implement this change, you'll also need to:

  1. Ensure NODE_ENV is set correctly in your build scripts (package.json)
  2. For development: "dev": "NODE_ENV=development webpack serve --mode development"
  3. For production: "build": "NODE_ENV=production webpack --mode production"

src/js/nice-select2.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
mohammadbaghaei and others added 2 commits February 5, 2025 08:45
Co-authored-by: sourcery-ai[bot] <58596630+sourcery-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@mohammadbaghaei
Copy link
Author

@sourcery-ai review

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @mohammadbaghaei - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the public API methods and their parameters/return values to help users better understand how to use the library.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

src/js/nice-select2.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: sourcery-ai[bot] <58596630+sourcery-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@mohammadbaghaei
Copy link
Author

@sourcery-ai review

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @mohammadbaghaei - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider adding more robust error handling in the setValue method, particularly for invalid input types and edge cases. This would help prevent runtime errors.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.


NiceSelect.prototype.setValue = function(value){
setValue(value) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion: Add input validation for setValue method to handle invalid inputs more gracefully

Consider adding type validation and throwing appropriate errors for invalid inputs. For example, check if value is undefined/null and validate array elements for multiple selects.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant