-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix parse_source_type_name #4
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fix danielgtaylor/python-betterproto#562 , danielgtaylor/python-betterproto#437
The function
parse_source_type_name
used to rely on an ad-hoc regex to work. The function failed when the package name had capital letters, since it believed that the package was actually a message.Now, the function goes through the packages and the messages that are actually defined (no more guess) to find the right one.
I also did some small refactoring of
models.py
:FieldCompiler
used to inherit fromMessageCompiler
, which made no sense.The PR still lacks tests and some doc, but since it can take a while to write, I first wanted to have your point of view on this.
NOTE: I completely deleted
test_gen_ref_type.py
for now, but I plan to replace it once you agree with the content of the PRChecklist