[To Main] Feature - DESENG-667: Add engagement configuration summary

[NatSquared]

Issue #: https://citz-gdx.atlassian.net/browse/DESENG-667

Description of changes:

• Feature Add engagement configuration summary 🎟️ DESENG-667

  • Added a tabbed layout to the new engagement view page
  • Added a new "Configuration" tab to display the engagement's configuration details
    • The other tabs are blank for now, but will be filled in future tickets
  • The configuration tab allows navigating back to the engagement configuration page
  • Improvements to how engagements and related resources are fetched and saved

User Guide update ticket (if applicable):

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.04%. Comparing base (ee6caab) to head (993d964).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2577   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.04%   76.04%           
=======================================
  Files         609      609           
  Lines       22080    22083    +3     
  Branches     1785     1785           
=======================================
+ Hits        16790    16793    +3     
  Misses       5026     5026           
  Partials      264      264           

Flag	Coverage Δ
metweb	65.03% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
...eb/src/components/common/Indicators/StatusChip.tsx	76.92% <100.00%> (+3.01%)	⬆️
met-web/src/styles/Theme.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)

[Baelx]

😂These are funny but please continue to write descriptive commit messages and include the ticket number in each one

[Baelx]

Thanks for this quick work Nat! Could you please just review that screen reader users will have an okay time with the tooltip button for copying the URL? Ideally they'd get all the same feedback as sighted users but if not we can just make sure the button instructions are good.

Also, maybe it'd be a good idea for us all to start communicating more about adding net-new components and changing app infrastructure. I'm trying to be mindful of managing complexity with this app. Could you maybe see if you could synthesize ConfigWizard and CreationWizard? I won't be insistent on it since you know the code best but we need to try to be economical whenever we can.

[Baelx]

There looks to be a lot of very similar code to that in CreationWizard. Was there a reason we needed to create a net-new component for this? I see that you made it a Modal - does it need to be one or could we have just sent folks back to the CreationWizard?

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud