Migrate DevHub content from Old DevHub #8
Conversation
This represents a very, very rough draft of all the things "in DevHub" and one version of how we might bring them into the BCDG in future. Each of these pages represents a backlog item that will require collaboration with multiple other teams to complete. We may not need to migrate all of these before retiring DevHub, but certainly our users will benefit from prioritizing some of these!
…ting to the bottom of the document. Try to fix table markdown.
…ontent into drafts for now
…form - remove outdated / less relevant references
| | Application hosting | [Private Cloud (OpenShift)](/docs/default/component/platform-developer-docs), [Public Cloud](/docs/default/component/public-cloud-techdocs), [Private data centre](https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/services-for-government/information-management-technology/data-centre-managed-hosting-and-cloud-services) | | ||
|
|
||
| ## Determining suitability |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
my instinct says this should be above the chart - but defer to @Shivanganii
|
|
||
| | Tool | Purpose | Support | | ||
| |---|---|---| | ||
| | *Argo CD* | GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes | Availabe within OpenShift | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For the tools section specifically, does it need italics?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wanted to provide increase the visibility of the items in the Tool column, but it's not strictly necessary, but maybe we could use bold instead if that's preferable?
|
|
||
| * It can reduce the maintenance overhead of pipelines | ||
|
|
||
| * It will help you to reduce resource consumption by using a shared service |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we say, "It helps you to reduce..." > changing to active voice without changing meaning? The previous line meaning would change if it was active voice, not so sure about this one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For sure, no concerns with that change.
|
@Shivanganii I just realized that there's an important bit of info about this pull request that isn't at all obvious - we are actually only concerned about a single, new file (choosing-technology.md). The other new/edited files are heavily under construction and several won't ever be released. Apologies for this - I should have provided that information sooner. |
This represents a very, very rough draft of all the things "in DevHub" and one version of how we might bring them into the BCDG in future. They are intentionally not linked in the IA yet.