Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Georeferencing 3 #85

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Georeferencing 3 #85

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

pjanck
Copy link
Member

@pjanck pjanck commented Mar 20, 2021

Unit test

New unit test with two files containing the same geometry, but in different coordinate reference systems.

Covered topics

tick one/many

  • project setup
  • georeferencing
  • alignment semantics
  • alignment geometry
  • linear placement
  • project breakdown structure / spatial structure
  • terrain
  • triangulated irregular network
  • open cross profile
  • sectioned surface & solid
  • pavement & course
  • surface feature
  • earthworks
  • geotechnics
  • longitudinal products (barriers, guardrail, ...)
  • interchange
  • structural
  • drainage
  • signage
  • road furniture
  • rail furniture
  • ports & waterways furniture
  • bridge furniture

@pjanck pjanck added IFC4x3_RC3 IFC 4.3 RC3 content new New unit test labels Mar 20, 2021
Copy link
Collaborator

@jmirtsch jmirtsch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have an implementation that can validate the positioning across multiple projected coordinate systems but to the best of my ability it seems like a valid test case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
IFC4x3_RC3 IFC 4.3 RC3 content new New unit test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants