Add CNINode to cache filter #3164
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jayanthvn
approved these changes
Dec 31, 2024
We should reduce the number of CNINode object VPC CNI watches for to just the node it is managing as well. Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: Hao Zhou <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: Harish Kuna <[email protected]>
dims
force-pushed
the
add-CNINode-to-cache-filter
branch
from
6b38997 to
874114a
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We should reduce the number of CNINode object VPC CNI watches for to just the node it is managing as well.
What type of PR is this?
improvement
Which issue does this PR fix?:
Please see #3158
Very similar to #2887 and #2888 but this one is to limit
CNINode'sWhat does this PR do / Why do we need it?:
This PR adds a filter to reduce the number of CNINode object VPC CNI watches for to just the node it is managing.
Testing done on this change:
EKS scalability clusters by @hakuna-matatah
No.
Will this PR introduce any new dependencies?:
No.
Will this break upgrades or downgrades? Has updating a running cluster been tested?:
No.
Does this change require updates to the CNI daemonset config files to work?:
No.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?:
No.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.