Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(oauth2): allow confidential auth code http #189

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2024

Conversation

james-d-elliott
Copy link
Member

This allows confidential clients to use the http scheme for a redirect URI.

This allows confidential clients to use the http scheme for a redirect URI.
@james-d-elliott james-d-elliott requested a review from a team as a code owner December 27, 2024 07:44
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the OAuth2 authorization code flow handler in the handler/oauth2/flow_authorize_code_auth.go file. The primary changes involve refactoring the redirect URI security checking mechanism. The secureChecker method has been renamed to GetRedirectSecureChecker and now provides more flexible configuration for validating redirect URI security. The accompanying test file flow_authorize_code_auth_test.go has been updated with new test cases to cover additional scenarios, including HTTP redirect URIs for confidential clients and more complex authorization request configurations.

Changes

File Change Summary
handler/oauth2/flow_authorize_code_auth.go - Renamed secureChecker method to GetRedirectSecureChecker
- Updated method to first attempt custom redirect URI security checker from configuration
- Modified HandleAuthorizeEndpointRequest to use new security checking logic
handler/oauth2/flow_authorize_code_auth_test.go - Added new test cases for HTTP redirect URI with confidential clients
- Expanded test scenarios with more detailed authorization request configurations
- Added tests for audience matching and granted scope validation

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant AuthorizationServer
    participant RedirectURIChecker

    Client->>AuthorizationServer: Authorization Request
    AuthorizationServer->>RedirectURIChecker: Check Redirect URI Security
    alt Custom Checker Available
        RedirectURIChecker-->>AuthorizationServer: Use Custom Checker
    else Default Checker
        RedirectURIChecker-->>AuthorizationServer: Use Default Secure Checker
    end
    alt URI is Secure
        AuthorizationServer->>Client: Authorization Code
    else URI is Insecure
        AuthorizationServer->>Client: Error Response
    end
Loading

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
handler/oauth2/flow_authorize_code_auth.go (2)

47-48: Optional: In-line documentation could clarify fallback behavior.

Consider adding a short comment about why the fallback is necessary and under what circumstances a custom checker might be provided.


62-62: Clarify error messaging for more user-friendly guidance.

The error hint is concise, but consider adding a note on how to configure or register a confidential client for http usage. This might help developers troubleshoot quickly.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 524abd8 and 586d44f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • handler/oauth2/flow_authorize_code_auth.go (2 hunks)
  • handler/oauth2/flow_authorize_code_auth_test.go (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
handler/oauth2/flow_authorize_code_auth.go (2)

43-45: Rename method appears consistent with best practices.

Renaming secureChecker to GetRedirectSecureChecker clarifies the method’s purpose. The fallback logic using oauth2.IsRedirectURISecure is a clean way to ensure a default checker is in place.


59-61: Ensure thorough testing for insecure protocols.

This check properly enforces HTTPS for public clients but allows HTTP for confidential clients. Confirm that edge cases like IP addresses or localhost usage are correctly handled, as local dev environments sometimes rely on http://127.0.0.1.

Would you like additional test coverage to validate IP-based redirect URIs or other local development usage?

handler/oauth2/flow_authorize_code_auth_test.go (2)

69-75: Test scenario captures the intended error for public client over HTTP.

This negative test effectively verifies that a public client's HTTP redirect is disallowed. The coverage is appropriate and ensures the error is properly raised.


99-128: Thorough validation of HTTP-based redirect for confidential clients.

The test covers:

  1. Successful issuance of authorization code.
  2. Properly captured granted scopes and state.

It's a good addition ensuring HTTP usage is valid for confidential clients.

@james-d-elliott james-d-elliott merged commit 7243b4e into master Dec 27, 2024
7 checks passed
@james-d-elliott james-d-elliott deleted the fix-redirect-uri-auth-code branch December 27, 2024 07:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant