Updating the README #1870
Updating the README #1870
Conversation
|
If you want to know: the picture for the repo was taken from the current website... Maybe we have another one, or maybe the logo would be best? |
The logo would be my choice, but I'd like to hear @sromkey and @Dhwaniartefact opinion on this. |
Sure, the logo sounds like a good choice! |
|
My only constraint is having a logo with a background that is not transparent - or something else that makes it visible both on a dark theme and on a light theme... ? |
|
Ready for second review - if it works for you we can add the logo in a potential other PR in the future :) |
demo_s004.png
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As we discussed in our meeting, maybe the screenshot should be removed because it's hard to keep up to date.
eviau-artefactual
force-pushed
the
updating-read-me
branch
from
067c006 to
f932fcd
Compare
Hello!
A surprise PR with a few updates to the README for clarification, with the goal of helping contributors find the information they need.
View how it would look like in the end
Let me know what you think?