[SPARK-50994][SQL][WIP] Perform RDD conversion under tracked execution #49678
+30
−5
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Wrap
Dataset.rdd
insidewithNewRDDExecutionId
, which takes care of important setup tasks, like updating Spark properties inSparkContext
's thread-locals, before executing theSparkPlan
to fetch data. This also makes it possible to track any prerequisite tasks (Shuffle
,Scan
etc.) for generating the RDD in the Spark UI.Why are the changes needed?
When
Dataset
is converted intoRDD
, It executesSpakPlan
without any execution context. This leads to:RDD
.RDD
execution context. This leads to these properties not being sent withTaskContext
but some operations like reading parquet files depend on these properties (eg, case-sesitivity).Test scenario:
In the above scenario,
.rdd
triggers execution which performs shuffle after reading parquetspark.sql.caseSensitive
is not set (even though it is passed during session creation) which is referred intoSQLConf
byparquet-mr
readerdropDuplicates
as it would drop duplicates by eithera
or 'A'. Expectation is to drop duplicates by columna
hadoopContext
hence is disabled.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
Existing testcases & new test case added for specific scenario
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No