Documentation: update uorb and sensor driver doc

[Donny9]

Summary

Documentation: update uorb and sensor driver doc, include uorb usage and sensor driver introduce.

Impact

N/A

Testing

make html

[nuttxpr]

[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]

No. This PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. The summary is too brief and lacks crucial information. It doesn't explain why the documentation update is necessary (bug fix, clarification, new feature documentation, etc.), what functional parts of the documentation are changed (specific files or sections), or how the changes improve the documentation.

The "Impact" section uses "N/A" which is discouraged. Even documentation changes have an impact (positive hopefully!). At a minimum, it should state "Impact on documentation: YES - This PR updates the documentation for uORB and sensor drivers to include usage information and an introduction to sensor drivers."

The "Testing" section is insufficient. "make html" only confirms the documentation builds. It doesn't demonstrate that the content of the documentation is correct, complete, and helpful. Ideally, you would describe how you verified the documentation's accuracy (e.g., "Followed the updated uORB usage instructions and confirmed they work as described"). While testing documentation can be different from testing code, it still requires verification.

[raiden00pl]

@Donny9 thanks for this. In the future try to follow recommended headings style for sections from here: https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/contributing/documentation.html#headings

I'll fix that now, as I'm just working on this section of the doc

[raiden00pl]

@Donny9 do you have this image https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15557/files#diff-f7365cd8c454337abe9252b36a4a04513ca4f83d3a6c35e92b51f53894442904 but without watermarks ? They are barely visible, but if you look closely you can see them :)

[Donny9]

@Donny9 do you have this image https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15557/files#diff-f7365cd8c454337abe9252b36a4a04513ca4f83d3a6c35e92b51f53894442904 but without watermarks ? They are barely visible, but if you look closely you can see them :)

Let me think if there are other methods. All our materials will be watermarked. @raiden00pl

[xiaoxiang781216]

@Donny9 there a trick to download the picture without watermark, let's talk offline.