Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#2929] improvement(pyClient): Optimize Python client code and add integration test #3125

Conversation

jerryshao
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

  1. Add _ before Python class member variable name, let it to private access level.
  2. Add Metalake, Schema E2E integration test.

Why are the changes needed?

Fix: #2929

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

N/A

How was this patch tested?

CI Passed.

…tegration test (#2930)

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

1. Add `_` before Python class member variable name, let it to private
access level.
2. Add Metalake, Schema E2E integration test.

### Why are the changes needed?

Fix: #2929

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

N/A

### How was this patch tested?

CI Passed.

---------

Co-authored-by: yuhui <[email protected]>
@jerryshao jerryshao added cherry-pick need backport Issues that need to backport to another branch labels Apr 23, 2024
@qqqttt123 qqqttt123 merged commit 4db1a3c into branch-0.5 Apr 23, 2024
9 checks passed
@qqqttt123 qqqttt123 deleted the cherry-pick-branch-0.5-cd82b6ca365214d313c053a014f85107e03d4671 branch April 23, 2024 08:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick need backport Issues that need to backport to another branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants