Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add additional protobuf tests for plans that read parquet with projections #14924

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2025

Conversation

alamb
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb commented Feb 28, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

Rationale for this change

I wanted to help #14679 by increasing test coverage (and so we were more confident in the fix in #14685 @blaginin 🙏 )

@mkmik proposed some nice tests in #14679 so I think it would be good to add test coverage directly

What changes are included in this PR?

  1. Add tests that SELECT ... from can be round tripped through protouf

Are these changes tested?

They are only tests

Are there any user-facing changes?

There are no user facing changes

@github-actions github-actions bot added the proto Related to proto crate label Feb 28, 2025
@alamb alamb changed the title Add additional protobuf tests for Add additional protobuf tests for plans that read parquet with projections Feb 28, 2025
@alamb alamb marked this pull request as ready for review February 28, 2025 02:50
@mkmik
Copy link
Contributor

mkmik commented Feb 28, 2025

@alamb wrong Marko :-)

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Feb 28, 2025

@alamb wrong Marko :-)

Sorry about that -- I meant @milenkovicm (but it was nice to see you online 👋 )

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Feb 28, 2025

Thank you for the review @xudong963

@alamb alamb merged commit f47b560 into apache:main Feb 28, 2025
25 checks passed
@alamb alamb deleted the alamb/proto_tests branch February 28, 2025 11:50
@milenkovicm
Copy link
Contributor

thanks @alamb

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Feb 28, 2025

thanks @alamb

@blaginin and @mertak-synnada and @xudong963 did all the work to actually fix the issue :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
proto Related to proto crate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants