Update PR Template for better Phabricator parsing

Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2916

Differential Revision: D15349297

Pulled By: jfix71

fbshipit-source-id: 460a7a17f32fd7fad01ca77453d7d8ee0773e252

PULL_REQUEST.md

@@ -9,19 +9,19 @@ For example:
 
 Ideally, the same format should be used in the commit message.
 
-# Description
+# Summary
 
-The description field should include a more verbose explanation of what this PR does.
+The Summary field should include a more verbose explanation of what this PR does.
 If this PR causes a change in behavior it should document the behavior before and after.
 If it fixes a bug, please, describe what the original issue is and how the change resolves it.
 
 # Formatting
 
 Please, run clang-format before submitting the PR.
 
-# Testing
+# Test Plan
 
-The testing section should include an explanation of what testing was done.
+The test plan section should include an explanation of what testing was done.
 For example unit test, manual testing through stand-alone testing binaries like mnist, cifar10, etc.
 Please use your best judgment or ask for guidance if you are unsure what kind of testing is required for a given change.
 The riskier the change, the more comprehensive the testing should be.
@@ -41,4 +41,3 @@ This way Github will make sure that underlying referenced issue will be automati
 
 If the purpose of the PR to address issue partially, please, just tag the issue:
 * #Issue.
-

PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
-*Description*:
-*Testing*:
-*Documentation*:
+Summary:
+
+Documentation:
+
+Test Plan:
+
 [Optional Fixes #issue]
 
 Please see a detailed explanation of how to fill out the fields in the relevant sections in PULL_REQUEST.md.