Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ref: rename surface store #574

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

niermann999
Copy link
Contributor

@niermann999 niermann999 commented Oct 23, 2023

After the merging of the surface acceleration structures with the surface vector did not work, this PR restores the naming of the data stores. Also correctly passes the source links on to the surfaces in the geometry IO and restricts the type ids to 8bits

@niermann999
Copy link
Contributor Author

This should not have an effect on traccc

pass it to the surface descriptor in the IO. Also fixes the
type ids to 8bits.
@niermann999
Copy link
Contributor Author

niermann999 commented Oct 24, 2023

This is the first step in refactoring the surface lookup, so that we can get surface objects not just from geometry::barcode but also from the surface source links (which in most cases I hope are ACTS geoIDs)

Copy link
Collaborator

@beomki-yeo beomki-yeo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@niermann999 niermann999 merged commit f67f958 into acts-project:main Oct 24, 2023
16 checks passed
beomki-yeo pushed a commit to beomki-yeo/detray that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2023
After the merging of the surface acceleration structures with the surface vector did not work, this PR restores the naming of the data stores. Also correctly passes the source links on to the surfaces in the geometry IO and restricts the type ids to 8bits
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants