Gcode class

[philipp1604]

Description

The following changes have been made to the GCodeProcessor:

1. All names, methods, and variables have been uniformly changed to use the identifier g_code.
2. The format of the g_code has been updated to an array dictionary format ([{G: 1, X: 2.0, Y: 1.0}, {G: 1, X: 1.0}, ...]).
3. The read_g_code() method has been modified to convert the input to this new format.

Motivation and Context

Change Number 1 was implemented to enhance the overall code style.

Changes Number 1 and 3 were made to improve the handling of g_code. Utilizing dictionaries makes it more convenient to manage information within the G-code.

How has this been tested?

The changes have been thoroughly tested using the test method. The modifications are isolated and do not impact other areas of the code.

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

• My code follows the code style of this project.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (fa11024) 85.27% compared to head (e16f2e6) 86.96%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/pybullet_industrial/g_code_processor.py	97.67%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #52      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.27%   86.96%   +1.68%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines         951      951              
==========================================
+ Hits          811      827      +16     
+ Misses        140      124      -16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[liquidcronos]

It is completely unclear to me what the changes proposed are meant to achieve.
It seems that some are just renaming variables while other change lists to dict etc...
Is it just a refractoring that does not change the behavior of the code or is this pull request fixing any bugs?
Please fill out the pull request template to clarify

[philipp1604]

It is completely unclear to me what the changes proposed are meant to achieve. It seems that some are just renaming variables while other change lists to dict etc... Is it just a refractoring that does not change the behavior of the code or is this pull request fixing any bugs? Please fill out the pull request template to clarify

It is completely unclear to me what the changes proposed are meant to achieve. It seems that some are just renaming variables while other change lists to dict etc... Is it just a refractoring that does not change the behavior of the code or is this pull request fixing any bugs? Please fill out the pull request template to clarify

Hello @liquidcronos,
sorry for not adressing the changes correctly. I updated the description now.

[MaHajo]

Closing pull-request due to it beeing outdated.