Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
config: Improve input checking in config command #209
config: Improve input checking in config command #209
Changes from all commits
1bb71de
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this idiomatic? I tend to think short cli args can be stacked like
tool -abcdef
, and yeah that's how argparse works also: https://docs.python.org/3/library/argparse.html#option-value-syntaxIt seems like it'd be confusing to pass e.g.
-nx
and not know if that's short for-n -x
or--no-xlong-argument
, I think the way revup is set up here it'd always be--no-xlong-argument
but I'm not sure if I've seen a cli tool where that'd be the caseThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah true, fwiw we don't have any flags that use -n for roughly this reason (except stragglers in toolkit that can be changed) would this be better if we formalized that?
we can also get rid of the short syntax and use only --no- longform syntax, i'm not that attached to it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I'd rather use only
--no-
longformThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sg i'll make that a new pr though, its not strictly related to this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SGTM