Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pick up cans down the road #251

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

Pick up cans down the road #251

merged 13 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

jacobvjk
Copy link
Member

@jacobvjk jacobvjk commented Nov 19, 2024

relates to #213

Note

TODOs related to the plots, tests, and examples in the user-facing functions will be handled in another PR

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.32258% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 52.07%. Comparing base (2a2a706) to head (1be8f44).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
R/match_loanbooks.R 50.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #251      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   51.35%   52.07%   +0.71%     
==========================================
  Files          28       28              
  Lines        3102     3161      +59     
==========================================
+ Hits         1593     1646      +53     
- Misses       1509     1515       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@jacobvjk jacobvjk requested review from cjyetman and jdhoffa November 19, 2024 15:30
Copy link
Member

@cjyetman cjyetman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

all looks reasonable to me, though to be honest there's a lot going on here so it's hard for me to fully tell if some things were properly addressed or not, e.g. this comment was removed "# TODO: when benchmarks get re-introduced, they need to be removed here", but it's not clear to me if/where that is be handled elsewhere in this PR

@jacobvjk
Copy link
Member Author

all looks reasonable to me, though to be honest there's a lot going on here so it's hard for me to fully tell if some things were properly addressed or not, e.g. this comment was removed "# TODO: when benchmarks get re-introduced, they need to be removed here", but it's not clear to me if/where that is be handled elsewhere in this PR

yes, I realize that if we want to track all of these properly, I would have to make one Pr for each type of TODO. the one you mentioned was removed as obsolete because there is no plan on the horizon to reintroduce corporate economy benchmarks for the net alignment metric

@jacobvjk
Copy link
Member Author

I added a more detailed description to the PR to ensure the reasoning for every removal can be tracked

@jacobvjk jacobvjk merged commit 6fd6f72 into main Nov 19, 2024
11 checks passed
@jacobvjk jacobvjk deleted the pick-up-cans-down-the-road branch November 19, 2024 16:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants