Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prototype_source/prototype_index.rst 번역 #920

Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 3 additions & 5 deletions prototype_source/prototype_index.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
PyTorch Prototype Recipes
파이토치 프로토타입 레시피
---------------------------------------------
Prototype features are not available as part of binary distributions like PyPI or Conda (except maybe behind run-time flags). To test these features we would, depending on the feature, recommend building from master or using the nightly wheels that are made available on `pytorch.org <https://pytorch.org>`_.

*Level of commitment*: We are committing to gathering high bandwidth feedback only on these features. Based on this feedback and potential further engagement between community members, we as a community will decide if we want to upgrade the level of commitment or to fail fast.

프로토타입(prototype) 기능은 런타임 플래그 없이는 PyPI나 Conda로 배포되는 바이너리에서는 사용할 수 없습니다. 이러한 기능들을 테스트하려면, 기능에 따라 master에서 빌드하거나 `pytorch.org <https://pytorch.org>`에서 제공하는 nightly build를 사용하는 것을 권장합니다.

*약속의 수준*: 우리는 이러한 기능들에 대해서만 고급 피드백을 수집하는 데 집중하고 있습니다. 피드백과 커뮤니티 구성원 간의 추가적인 논의에 따라, 우리는 커뮤니티로서 기능을 더 발전시킬지 아니면 빠르게 중단할지를 결정하게 됩니다.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

potential further engagement는 잠재적인 추가 참여가 조금 더 적절할거 같습니다

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

이 문장에서 '우리'는 하나만 써도 될 거 같습니다

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

level of commitment를 앞에 소제목에서는 약속의 수준이라고 번역하였고
여기서는 기능이라고 번역되었는데, 약간 의미가 다르므로 둘다 적절히 쓸수 있는 용어로 대체하는게 좋을거 같습니다

.. raw:: html

</div>
Expand Down