Improve detection of "nosec" clause #579
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@lukehinds |
ericwb
requested changes
Feb 8, 2022
| nosec_lines = set() | ||
| else: | ||
|
|
||
| nosec_lines = set() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code here has changed enough after you rebase, that your changes might no longer have an effect. Please rebase and re-assess whether this is still an improvement.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to the issue #490 and the implementation of #383 i make a improvement for the most cases (code without nosec comments) that improve the preformance in around 45%
Bandit 1.6.2 now 11.666704
Bandit with changes 5.396222