Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Edit:Upgrade-flutter_svg from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 #2119

Merged

Conversation

nidhin29
Copy link
Contributor

This change included the upgrading of flutter_svg package from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9

Issue Number: #2093

Fixed #2093

Did you add tests for your changes?

No tests are required for this change as it only includes a package update.

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Updation the documentation isnt required for this.

Summary

It upgrades flutter_svg package from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No, this does not introduce any major changes to the codebase.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes, i have followed the guidelines.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 20, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (b548497) 76.43% compared to head (46d0f1d) 77.29%.
Report is 10 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2119      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    76.43%   77.29%   +0.86%     
===========================================
  Files          152      152              
  Lines         7438     7456      +18     
===========================================
+ Hits          5685     5763      +78     
+ Misses        1753     1693      -60     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 4385f71 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop Nov 21, 2023
7 of 8 checks passed
palisadoes pushed a commit to palisadoes/talawa that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Upgrade package flutter_svg from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9
3 participants