Figma: Refactor CSS files in src/components/CheckIn #3416

MayankJha014 · 2025-01-24T21:22:36Z

Removed css file and corrected it import.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Refactor
- Removed dedicated CSS module for CheckIn modal
- Updated styling import for CheckIn modal to use a shared application stylesheet

coderabbitai · 2025-01-24T21:22:43Z

Walkthrough

This pull request is part of a broader initiative to consolidate CSS files into a single global stylesheet (src/style/app.module.css). Specifically, the changes involve removing the CheckInModal.module.css file and updating the import statement in CheckInModal.tsx to reference the global CSS file. This is consistent with the project's goal of streamlining CSS management and improving UI/UX across the Talawa-Admin application.

Changes

File	Change Summary
`src/components/CheckIn/CheckInModal.module.css`	Deleted CSS file containing loader styles
`src/components/CheckIn/CheckInModal.tsx`	Updated import statement from local CSS module to global `app.module.css`

Possibly related issues

Figma: Refactor CSS files in src/components/CheckIn #3329: Refactor CSS files in src/components/CheckIn
- This PR directly addresses the goal of consolidating CSS into a single global file
Refactor CSS in src/components/CheckIn/tagTemplate.ts #2906: Refactor CSS in src/components/CheckIn/tagTemplate.ts
- Part of the broader CSS refactoring effort in the CheckIn component area

Possibly related PRs

refactor CSS src/components/EventRegistrantsModal #3383: Deletion of EventRegistrantsModal.module.css
Fixes #3343 added styles from Loader.module.css to a global css file app.module.css #3398: Deletion of Loader.module.css
Refactored CurrentHourIndicator component to use the global CSS file (app.module.css) instead of a component-specific CSS file (CurrentHourIndicator.module.css). #3404: Refactoring component to use global CSS file

Suggested reviewers

palisadoes

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's CSS Consolidation Ode 🎨

Modules scattered, styles astray,
One global file to save the day!
CheckIn's loader, now streamlined and neat,
A CSS dance that can't be beat!
Hop, hop, hooray for clean design! 🌈

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5f3c32 and 7ef8a03.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

src/components/CheckIn/CheckInModal.module.css (0 hunks)
src/components/CheckIn/CheckInModal.tsx (1 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

src/components/CheckIn/CheckInModal.module.css

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

src/components/CheckIn/CheckInModal.tsx

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

GitHub Check: Test Application

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

github-actions · 2025-01-24T21:22:59Z

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

comments in this PR or
our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

codecov · 2025-01-24T21:26:49Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.72%. Comparing base (5b4983b) to head (7ef8a03).
Report is 29 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3416       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage              7.95%   89.72%   +81.77%     
=====================================================
  Files                   312      334       +22     
  Lines                  8105     8626      +521     
  Branches               1801     1919      +118     
=====================================================
+ Hits                    645     7740     +7095     
+ Misses                 7393      624     -6769     
- Partials                 67      262      +195

Flag	Coverage Δ
combined	`89.72% <ø> (?)`
jest	`7.90% <ø> (?)`
vitest	`89.72% <ø> (?)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

MayankJha014 · 2025-01-24T21:45:07Z

@palisadoes In this i have merged src/components/CheckIn file . Is there i have to do something else

Cioppolo14 · 2025-01-24T23:53:28Z

@MayankJha014 Did you link the wrong issue?

palisadoes · 2025-01-25T02:40:05Z

Please provide video of you work as requested in the issue
You are linking to the wrong issue

remove css file

7ef8a03

coderabbitai bot approved these changes Jan 24, 2025

View reviewed changes

palisadoes approved these changes Jan 25, 2025

View reviewed changes

palisadoes merged commit a52e5ce into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Jan 25, 2025
19 checks passed

This was referenced Jan 25, 2025

Updating to NEW COLOR SCHEME 3 #3354

Merged

Figma: Refactor CSS files in src/components/AgendaCategory #3472

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Figma: Refactor CSS files in src/components/CheckIn #3416

Figma: Refactor CSS files in src/components/CheckIn #3416

MayankJha014 commented Jan 24, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

github-actions bot commented Jan 24, 2025

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2025 •

edited

Loading

MayankJha014 commented Jan 24, 2025

Cioppolo14 commented Jan 24, 2025

palisadoes commented Jan 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Figma: Refactor CSS files in src/components/CheckIn #3416

Figma: Refactor CSS files in src/components/CheckIn #3416

Conversation

MayankJha014 commented Jan 24, 2025 • edited by coderabbitai bot Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2025 • edited Loading

Walkthrough

Changes

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

Poem

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

github-actions bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Testing Your Code

Reviewers

Reviewing Your Code

CONTRIBUTING.md

Other

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2025 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

MayankJha014 commented Jan 24, 2025

Cioppolo14 commented Jan 24, 2025

palisadoes commented Jan 25, 2025 • edited Loading

MayankJha014 commented Jan 24, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2025 •

edited

Loading

palisadoes commented Jan 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading