Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixed #3318 Figma: Refactor CSS files in src/components/OrganizationCard #3406

Conversation

gurramkarthiknetha
Copy link
Contributor

@gurramkarthiknetha gurramkarthiknetha commented Jan 23, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

UI/UX improvement, refactoring of CSS for better accessibility and maintainability.

Issue Number:

Fixes #3318

Snapshots/Videos:

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

N/A - This PR does not introduce new functionality requiring updates to Talawa-Docs.

Summary

This PR addresses the issue by:

  • Refactoring and consolidating all CSS into the global file src/style/app.module.css.
  • Deleting CSS files in subdirectories and ensuring all styles are referenced from the global file.
  • Enhancing the UI/UX to be more color-blind friendly.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No, this PR does not introduce breaking changes. It only refactors styles and updates UI components for consistency and accessibility.

Checklist

UI/UX Improvements

  • Adhered to the guidelines for making the application color-blind friendly.
  • Refactored CSS to streamline into a single global file: src/style/app.module.css.
  • Deleted all CSS files in subdirectories and related components.
  • Removed all HTML color codes except in src/style/app.module.css.
  • Used descriptive CSS variable names for colors (e.g., --search-button-bg instead of --light-blue).
  • Standardized button, dropdown, and search box behavior:
    • Buttons and dropdowns only have shadows on hover.
    • Shadows for search boxes are visible only when selected.
  • Ensured consistency with pre-existing CSS and referenced relevant design patterns (e.g., modal design standards).

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • Reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI.
  • Implemented or justified each non-critical suggestion.
  • Documented reasoning in PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented.

Test Coverage

  • Written tests for all new changes/features.
  • Verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%.
  • Ran the test suite locally, ensuring all tests pass.

Additional Information

  • This PR consolidates styles from various components into src/style/app.module.css, removing redundancy and improving maintainability.
  • Any deviations from the guidelines were aligned with decisions made in PRs Chore/css changes #2466 and Updating to NEW COLOR SCHEME #2984 to ensure consistency.
  • Testing included validating all UI interactions to confirm that shadows, color schemes, and hover effects behave as expected.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style Changes
    • Relocated styling for the organization card from a dedicated module to the main application style module.
    • Introduced new CSS classes for avatar, warning text, header, content padding, and dividers.
    • Improved variable naming for better clarity and consistency.
    • Removed outdated CSS classes from the organization card module.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced error handling for accessing user data in the organization card component.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@gurramkarthiknetha has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 15 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83971a6 and 6b18050.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (50 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on refactoring the CSS for the OrganizationCard component by removing its local CSS module and integrating its styles into the global app.module.css file. The changes involve updating the CSS import in the OrganizationCard.tsx component, renaming CSS variables to be more descriptive, and adding new CSS classes to maintain the existing styling while improving code organization and maintainability.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.module.css Completely removed
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx Updated CSS import to ../../style/app.module.css and enhanced error handling in useEffect
src/style/app.module.css Renamed CSS variables, added new classes like .organizationCard_avatar, .organizationCard_warning, .organizationCard_header, .organizationCard_content, .organizationCard_divider, .second_box > h4, and .second_box > h5

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Consolidate CSS into src/style/app.module.css
Delete CSS files in component directory
Use descriptive variable names Variables like --border-color replace --grey-border
Remove HTML color codes (except in global CSS)

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • pranshugupta54
  • AVtheking
  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 CSS Refactor Hop! 🎨

In the land of styles so bright,
We've merged the modules, made them light.
Variables renamed with care,
Global CSS beyond compare!

Hop, hop, hooray! 🌈


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.72%. Comparing base (c5f3c32) to head (6b18050).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3406       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage              7.90%   89.72%   +81.82%     
=====================================================
  Files                   312      334       +22     
  Lines                  8163     8626      +463     
  Branches               1837     1919       +82     
=====================================================
+ Hits                    645     7740     +7095     
+ Misses                 7451      624     -6827     
- Partials                 67      262      +195     
Flag Coverage Δ
combined 89.72% <ø> (?)
jest 7.90% <ø> (?)
vitest 89.72% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

Line range hint 6138-6165: Add keyboard navigation support for interactive elements.

Ensure interactive elements are keyboard accessible by adding proper focus styles.

 .cardsEventListCard {
   /* ... existing styles ... */
+  outline: none;
 }

+.cardsEventListCard:focus-visible {
+  outline: 2px solid var(--subtle-blue-grey);
+  outline-offset: 2px;
+}

 .cardsEventListCard a {
   color: var(--primary-bg-color);
   font-weight: 600;
+  text-decoration: none;
+  transition: text-decoration 0.2s ease;
 }

-.cardsEventListCard a:hover {
+.cardsEventListCard a:hover,
+.cardsEventListCard a:focus-visible {
   color: var(--black-color);
+  text-decoration: underline;
 }
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx (3)

Line range hint 77-82: Consider adding error boundary for better error handling.

The component has error handling for local storage access, but it could benefit from a higher-level error boundary to catch rendering errors.

+import { ErrorBoundary } from 'react-error-boundary';
+
+function ErrorFallback({ error }) {
+  return (
+    <div role="alert">
+      <p>Something went wrong:</p>
+      <pre>{error.message}</pre>
+    </div>
+  );
+}

 function OrganizationCard({...}) {
   return (
+    <ErrorBoundary FallbackComponent={ErrorFallback}>
       <div className={styles.orgCard}>
         {/* ... existing content ... */}
       </div>
+    </ErrorBoundary>
   );
 }

Line range hint 156-167: Add loading state for async operations.

The component performs async operations (join, withdraw) but doesn't show loading states, which could lead to a poor user experience.

 function OrganizationCard({...}) {
+  const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false);
   
   async function joinOrganization(): Promise<void> {
     try {
+      setIsLoading(true);
       if (userRegistrationRequired) {
         await sendMembershipRequest({...});
       } else {
         await joinPublicOrganization({...});
       }
       refetch();
     } catch (error) {
       // ... error handling ...
     } finally {
+      setIsLoading(false);
     }
   }

   return (
     <div className={styles.orgCard}>
       {/* ... other content ... */}
       <Button 
         onClick={joinOrganization}
         disabled={isLoading}
       >
+        {isLoading ? 'Loading...' : t('joinNow')}
       </Button>
     </div>
   );
 }

Line range hint 187-206: Add retry mechanism for membership withdrawal.

The membership withdrawal function could benefit from a retry mechanism in case of temporary network issues.

+const MAX_RETRIES = 3;
+const RETRY_DELAY = 1000;

+async function retry<T>(
+  fn: () => Promise<T>,
+  retries: number = MAX_RETRIES,
+  delay: number = RETRY_DELAY
+): Promise<T> {
+  try {
+    return await fn();
+  } catch (error) {
+    if (retries > 0) {
+      await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, delay));
+      return retry(fn, retries - 1, delay);
+    }
+    throw error;
+  }
+}

 async function withdrawMembershipRequest(): Promise<void> {
   if (!userId) {
     toast.error(t('UserIdNotFound') as string);
     return;
   }
   
   try {
-    await cancelMembershipRequest({...});
+    await retry(() => cancelMembershipRequest({...}));
     toast.success(t('MembershipRequestWithdrawn') as string);
   } catch (error) {
     // ... error handling ...
   }
 }
src/style/app.module.css (2)

Line range hint 77-92: Improve color variable naming for better maintainability.

Consider using semantic color names that reflect their purpose rather than their visual appearance.

-  --primary-bg-color: #ffffff;
-  --off-white-color: #ffffff97;
-  --black-color: #000000;
-  --black-shadow-color: #00000029;
-  --white-shadow-color: #ffffff33;
-  --warning-text-color: #febc59;
+  --surface-primary: #ffffff;
+  --surface-primary-alpha: #ffffff97;
+  --text-primary: #000000;
+  --shadow-dark: #00000029;
+  --shadow-light: #ffffff33;
+  --text-warning: #febc59;

7325-7371: LGTM! New OrganizationCard classes follow BEM methodology.

The new CSS classes for OrganizationCard are well-structured and follow BEM naming conventions.

However, consider adding hover and focus states for better accessibility:

 .alignimg {
   border-radius: 50%;
   background-blend-mode: darken;
   background-color: var(--primary-bg-color);
   height: 65px;
   width: 65px;
+  transition: transform 0.2s ease;
 }
+
+.alignimg:hover,
+.alignimg:focus-visible {
+  transform: scale(1.05);
+}

 .box {
   color: var(--warning-text-color);
+  transition: opacity 0.2s ease;
 }

-.box :hover {
+.box:hover,
+.box:focus-visible {
   color: var(--warning-text-color);
+  opacity: 0.8;
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a8f2b25 and 9a8fee0.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.module.css (0 hunks)
  • src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (44 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.module.css
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx (2)

2-2: LGTM! CSS module import updated correctly.

The import statement has been updated to use the global CSS module as per the refactoring requirements.


Line range hint 1266-1266: Verify CSS class usage after refactoring.

The component uses several CSS classes that reference --primary-bg-color. Please ensure all these classes are properly styled in the global CSS module.

Also applies to: 1278-1278, 1310-1310, 1316-1316, 1376-1376, 1388-1388, 1473-1473, 1482-1482

✅ Verification successful

CSS classes and primary-bg-color variable are properly implemented

The CSS classes are correctly styled in the global CSS module (app.module.css). The --primary-bg-color variable is properly defined in the root scope as #ffffff and is consistently used across multiple component styles, including organization card related classes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any CSS classes in the component that might be missing in the global CSS
rg -A 1 'className=\{.*\}' src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx | \
  grep -o '{styles\.[^}]*}' | \
  sed 's/{styles\.\([^}]*\)}/\1/' | \
  while read -r class; do
    echo "Checking class: $class"
    rg "\\.$class\\s*{" src/style/app.module.css
done

Length of output: 2568


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, find the component's CSS module
echo "=== Checking for component's CSS module ==="
fd -e css -e scss "OrganizationCard" src/

echo -e "\n=== Checking CSS classes and primary-bg-color usage ==="
# Search in potential CSS files with fixed regex
for ext in css scss; do
  echo -e "\nSearching in *.$ext files:"
  rg --type $ext -l "\.orgCard|\.innerContainer|\.orgImgContainer|\.content|\.orgName|\.orgdesc|\.address|\.orgadmin|\.joinedBtn|\.withdrawBtn|\.joinBtn" src/
done

echo -e "\n=== Checking primary-bg-color usage ==="
rg --type css --type scss "--primary-bg-color" src/

Length of output: 1642


Script:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== OrganizationCard.module.css content ==="
cat src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.module.css

echo -e "\n=== Checking primary-bg-color usage ==="
rg "var\(--primary-bg-color\)" src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.module.css

echo -e "\n=== Checking class definitions ==="
rg "^\.(orgCard|innerContainer|orgImgContainer|content|orgName|orgdesc|address|orgadmin|joinedBtn|withdrawBtn|joinBtn)" src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.module.css

Length of output: 617


Script:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Checking app.module.css content ==="
cat src/style/app.module.css

echo -e "\n=== Searching for primary-bg-color in all CSS files ==="
rg "var\(--primary-bg-color\)" "src/**/*.css"

echo -e "\n=== Checking where primary-bg-color is defined ==="
rg "^\s*--primary-bg-color:" "src/**/*.css"

Length of output: 66088

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 23, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file needs to be deleted

  • src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.module.css

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 24, 2025
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

please fix the conflicting file

@gurramkarthiknetha
Copy link
Contributor Author

please fix the conflicting file

i fixed it now

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

Line range hint 1-7461: Improve CSS organization for better maintainability.

Consider reorganizing the CSS file for better maintainability:

  1. Group related styles:

    /* 1. CSS Variables */
    :root { ... }
    
    /* 2. Global Styles */
    .fonts { ... }
    
    /* 3. Layout Components */
    .container { ... }
    
    /* 4. UI Components */
    .button { ... }
    
    /* 5. Component-Specific Styles */
    /* OrganizationCard */
    .organizationCard { ... }
    
    /* 6. Media Queries */
    @media (max-width: ...) { ... }
  2. Consider splitting into multiple files:

    • variables.css: CSS variables
    • global.css: Global styles
    • components/: Component-specific styles
    • layout.css: Layout styles
    • media.css: Media queries
  3. Add section comments for better navigation

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between aa25035 and b9941f6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (44 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

44-44: LGTM! Improved semantic variable naming.

The renaming of CSS variables from color-based names to semantic names (e.g., --grey-border--border-color) improves code maintainability and accessibility by:

  • Making the purpose of each variable clearer
  • Decoupling visual appearance from function
  • Making it easier to maintain consistent theming

Also applies to: 77-77, 82-82, 92-92

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/style/app.module.css Show resolved Hide resolved
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please make coderabbit ai approve your PR

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9801784 and a1e8f4b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (44 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

44-44: Review CSS variable naming and color accessibility.

The color variable naming has been improved for better clarity:

  • --grey-border--border-color
  • --white-color--primary-bg-color
  • --light-orange--warning-text-color
  • --black--primary-text-color

However, there is still an accessibility issue:

The warning text color (--warning-text-color: #febc59) fails WCAG AA contrast requirements when used on white background (1.96:1 ratio, should be at least 4.5:1). Consider using a darker shade to meet accessibility standards.

Also applies to: 78-78, 83-83, 93-93


7440-7486: LGTM! Well-structured component styles.

The organization card styles have been properly refactored with:

  • Component-scoped class names (e.g., organizationCard_avatar, organizationCard_header)
  • Clear naming that indicates purpose
  • Proper use of CSS variables for colors and spacing

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 25, 2025
@gurramkarthiknetha
Copy link
Contributor Author

@palisadoes now the coderabbitai approved could you please review this

Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See comment

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See coment

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

7440-7486: Improved class naming using BEM convention.

The component styles now follow BEM naming convention (e.g., organizationCard_avatar, organizationCard_header) which improves maintainability and reduces the risk of naming conflicts.

However, the font sizes for h4 and h5 are too small for readability:

 .second_box > h4 {
-  font-size: 10px;
+  font-size: 14px; /* Minimum size for readable text */
   font-weight: bold;
   text-decoration: none;
   color: var(--primary-text-color);
 }

 .second_box > h5 {
   text-decoration: none;
-  font-size: 10px;
+  font-size: 12px; /* Minimum size for readable text */
   font-weight: 100;
   color: var(--background-primary);
 }

7452-7454: Use CSS variable for hover state color.

The hover state uses a hardcoded color value. For consistency and maintainability, this should use a CSS variable:

+:root {
+  --warning-text-hover: #b85c00;
+}

 .box :hover {
-  color: #b85c00; /* Example of a darker, accessible orange */
+  color: var(--warning-text-hover);
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1e8f4b and 22c6695.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (50 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

Line range hint 44-93: Improved semantic variable naming for better maintainability.

The variable renaming from color-based names to semantic names (e.g., --grey-border--border-color) improves maintainability and supports future dark mode implementation.

However, the warning text color still has accessibility issues:

-  --warning-text-color: #febc59;
+  --warning-text-color: #b85c00; /* Darker orange that meets WCAG AA contrast requirements */

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 25, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

83-83: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix warning text color for accessibility.

The warning text color #febc59 fails WCAG AA contrast requirements (1.96:1 ratio). Use a darker shade to meet accessibility standards.

-  --warning-text-color: #febc59;
+  --warning-text-color: #b85c00; /* Meets WCAG AA with 4.5:1 contrast ratio */
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

93-93: Use hex code for consistency in color values.

Replace the string value "black" with the hex code #000000 for consistency with other color definitions.

-  --primary-text-color: black;
+  --primary-text-color: #000000;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22c6695 and 83971a6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (50 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

7440-7486: LGTM! Well-structured BEM naming convention.

The organization card styles follow BEM naming convention, making the code more maintainable and reducing the likelihood of naming conflicts.

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Make coderabbit.ai approve your changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants