Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes[MemberDetail] : Refactor CSS files in src/screens/MemberDetail and updated the import file #3373

Conversation

Bittukr7479
Copy link

@Bittukr7479 Bittukr7479 commented Jan 21, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Issue Number:

Fixes #3313

Snapshots/Videos:

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style Changes

    • Updated styling imports for EventsAttendedMemberModal and CustomTableCell components.
    • Removed MemberDetail.module.css file, potentially affecting component styling.
  • Impact

    • Visual presentation of Member Detail screen components may be modified.
    • Styling source has been redirected to a new CSS module.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on refactoring CSS files for the Member Detail screen by removing the MemberDetail.module.css file and updating import statements in related components to use the global src/style/app.module.css file. The changes align with the project's goal of consolidating CSS styles into a single, centralized stylesheet, which aims to improve UI/UX and make the application more suitable for color-blind users.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/MemberDetail/EventsAttendedMemberModal.tsx, src/components/MemberDetail/customTableCell.tsx Updated CSS import from local module to global app.module.css
src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.module.css Completely removed CSS file

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Streamline CSS into single global file [#3313]
Delete CSS files in subdirectory [#3313]
Reference only global CSS file [#3313]

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes
  • rishav-jha-mech

Poem

🐰 CSS dancing, styles unite!
From scattered modules to one light
MemberDetail's stylesheet takes flight
Global CSS, a rabbit's delight
Simplicity wins the coding fight! 🎨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 140692e and a3ca02c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/MemberDetail/customTableCell.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/components/MemberDetail/customTableCell.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 21, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/MemberDetail/customTableCell.tsx (1)

32-32: Fix formatting issues with Prettier.

There are extra whitespace lines that need to be removed. Run Prettier to automatically fix these formatting issues:

npx prettier --write src/components/MemberDetail/customTableCell.tsx

Also applies to: 43-43

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 32-32: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9769c63 and 140692e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/MemberDetail/customTableCell.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/components/MemberDetail/customTableCell.tsx

[error] 32-32: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 43-43: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
src/components/MemberDetail/customTableCell.tsx

[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/MemberDetail/customTableCell.tsx (2)

Line range hint 13-77: Implementation looks solid!

The component demonstrates good practices:

  • Comprehensive error handling
  • Proper loading states
  • Well-documented with JSDoc
  • Testable with data-testid attributes
  • Proper date formatting and null checks
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 32-32: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.


5-5: Verify the style class exists in the global CSS file.

The import has been updated to use the global stylesheet, but we should verify that the membername class used in the Link component exists in app.module.css.

✅ Verification successful

CSS class migration is correct and functional

The membername class is properly defined in app.module.css with the expected styling (blue color for links). The import and usage in the component are correct.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the membername class in the global CSS file
rg -l "\.membername\s*{" "src/style/app.module.css"

# Check if any components still use the old CSS module
rg -l "MemberDetail\.module\.css" "src/"

Length of output: 188


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if both CSS files exist and show their contents
echo "=== Checking app.module.css ==="
fd "app.module.css" src/style/ --type f --exec cat {}

echo -e "\n=== Checking MemberDetail.module.css ==="
fd "MemberDetail.module.css" src/ --type f --exec cat {}

echo -e "\n=== Checking for old CSS module references ==="
rg "MemberDetail\.module\.css"

echo -e "\n=== Checking for membername class usage ==="
rg "membername" --type css
rg "className.*membername"

Length of output: 66187


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the component file content
echo "=== Component content ==="
cat src/components/MemberDetail/customTableCell.tsx

echo -e "\n=== Searching for membername class in all CSS files ==="
fd -e css -x grep -l "membername" {} \;

echo -e "\n=== Checking for usage of membername class in components ==="
rg "className.*membername" --type tsx

Length of output: 2779


Script:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Checking membername class in app.module.css ==="
rg -A 3 -B 3 "\.membername" src/style/app.module.css

echo -e "\n=== Checking membername class in MemberRequestCard.module.css ==="
rg -A 3 -B 3 "\.membername" src/components/MemberRequestCard/MemberRequestCard.module.css

Length of output: 669

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[warning] Code style issues found. Run Prettier with --write to fix formatting issues.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 21, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.74%. Comparing base (a32533b) to head (a3ca02c).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3373       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage              7.95%   89.74%   +81.79%     
=====================================================
  Files                   312      335       +23     
  Lines                  8109     8631      +522     
  Branches               1803     1932      +129     
=====================================================
+ Hits                    645     7746     +7101     
+ Misses                 7397      624     -6773     
- Partials                 67      261      +194     
Flag Coverage Δ
combined 89.74% <ø> (?)
jest 7.93% <ø> (?)
vitest 89.74% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Closing
  2. Youhave deleted screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.module.css without adding the styling to style/app.module.css.
  3. The application design will be fundamentally altered for the worse.
  4. Please be more careful. Open another PR with the expected holistic approach
  5. Post a video of your work as explained in the issue too.

@palisadoes palisadoes closed this Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants