Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added linters to the pull request GitHub action workflows #8

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 12, 2025

Conversation

palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes commented Jan 11, 2025

Added linters to the pull request GitHub action workflows

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added comprehensive docstring validation script.
    • Introduced CodeRabbit PR review validation.
    • Enhanced code quality checks in GitHub Actions workflow.
  • Documentation

    • Added configuration for docstring and code formatting standards.
    • Updated .gitignore with extensive file exclusion rules.
  • Chores

    • Updated requirements.txt with new development and testing dependencies.
    • Added linting and formatting tool configurations.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@palisadoes has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 18 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c77980 and 12e25ca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • requirements.txt (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces comprehensive improvements to the project's development workflow and code quality standards. The changes include adding configuration files for linting and formatting tools like Flake8, pydocstyle, and Black, updating the GitHub Actions workflow to include new validation and compliance checks, and introducing a new Python script for docstring validation. The modifications aim to enhance code documentation, enforce consistent coding standards, and improve the overall quality assurance process for pull requests.

Changes

File Change Summary
.flake8 Added configuration to ignore specific linting errors and set max line length to 80
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml Added new jobs: Validate-CodeRabbit and Docstring-Compliance; enhanced Code-Quality-Checks job
.github/workflows/scripts/check_docstrings.py New script to validate docstrings against Google style guide with multiple helper functions
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh New shell script to validate pull request reviews and CodeRabbit.ai approval
.gitignore Expanded to ignore more development-related files and directories
.pydocstyle Added configuration to use Google style guide and ignore specific docstring errors
pyproject.toml Added Black formatter configuration with 79-character line length
requirements.txt Added multiple dependencies across various categories including linting, testing, and data processing tools
.github/workflows/scripts/countline.py Adjusted formatting in documentation strings and comments for improved readability

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant PR as Pull Request
    participant GHA as GitHub Actions
    participant CC as Code Quality Checks
    participant DC as Docstring Compliance
    participant CR as CodeRabbit Validation

    PR->>GHA: Trigger workflow
    GHA->>CC: Run linting and formatting checks
    CC-->>GHA: Report results
    GHA->>DC: Check docstring compliance
    DC-->>GHA: Report docstring validation
    GHA->>CR: Validate CodeRabbit approval
    CR-->>GHA: Confirm or reject PR
Loading

Poem

🐰 Code's new guardian, strict and bright,
Docstrings dancing in pure delight
Linters whisper, formatters sing
Quality's rabbit takes its wing
Pull requests tremble, perfection's might! 🔍


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests and there are no merge conflicts.

The process helps maintain accurate and well-formatted documentation and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 12

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/scripts/check_docstrings.py (3)

29-35: Use specific exceptions instead of broad Exception

Catching broad exceptions can mask other issues and make debugging difficult. It's better to catch specific exceptions such as IOError or FileNotFoundError.

Apply this diff:

 try:
     with open(file_path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as fh_:
         lines_with_hard_returns = fh_.readlines()

-except Exception:
+except FileNotFoundError:
     return violations
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file


53-55: Simplify nested if statements

You can combine the nested if statements into a single condition to improve readability.

Apply this diff:

 if bool(decorator):
-    if decorator_in_docstring_exception_list(decorator):
+    if decorator_in_docstring_exception_list(decorator):
         continue

Or more succinctly:

-if bool(decorator):
-    if decorator_in_docstring_exception_list(decorator):
+if decorator and decorator_in_docstring_exception_list(decorator):
     continue
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

53-54: Use a single if statement instead of nested if statements

(SIM102)

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file


255-255: Avoid using built-in names for variables

Using Function as a variable name may shadow built-in names or cause confusion. Consider renaming it.

Apply this diff:

-Function = namedtuple("Function", "name arguments")
+FunctionInfo = namedtuple("FunctionInfo", "name arguments")

And update all references to Function accordingly.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)

222-255: Consider using pre-commit hooks for local development.

While GitHub Actions enforce linting on PRs, developers would benefit from running these checks locally before pushing changes.

Add a .pre-commit-config.yaml:

repos:
-   repo: https://github.com/psf/black
    rev: 23.12.1
    hooks:
    -   id: black
-   repo: https://github.com/PyCQA/flake8
    rev: 7.0.0
    hooks:
    -   id: flake8
        additional_dependencies: [flake8-docstrings]
-   repo: https://github.com/PyCQA/pydocstyle
    rev: 6.3.0
    hooks:
    -   id: pydocstyle
        args: [--convention=google, --add-ignore=D415,D205]
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

233-233: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5cb7218 and 2feee6a.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • .flake8 (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/scripts/check_docstrings.py (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh (1 hunks)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • .pydocstyle (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
  • requirements.txt (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • .pydocstyle
  • pyproject.toml
  • .flake8
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
.gitignore

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

.github/workflows/pull-request.yml

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

requirements.txt

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

.github/workflows/scripts/check_docstrings.py

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml

214-214: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:10: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


214-214: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:1: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


233-233: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
.github/workflows/scripts/check_docstrings.py

53-54: Use a single if statement instead of nested if statements

(SIM102)


138-138: Loop control variable argument_function not used within loop body

(B007)


162-162: Loop control variable argument_docstring not used within loop body

(B007)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh (1)

1-37: LGTM!

The script correctly fetches PR reviews and checks for approval by coderabbitai[bot]. Error handling and messages are appropriate.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

.gitignore (2)

1-62: Well-organized ignore patterns for development tools!

The structured sections for development tools and environment files are comprehensive and well-documented.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file


63-65: Comprehensive Python-specific ignore patterns!

The Python section includes all necessary patterns for ignoring cache files, build artifacts, and tool-specific directories that will be generated by the new linting tools.

Also applies to: 66-67, 68-69

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

Comment on lines +188 to +207
"""Extract the arguments of a function read from a file.

Args:
start: Starting line to process
lines: The file as a list of strings split by a new line separator

Returns:
result: The decorator line

"""
# Initialize key variable
result = None

# Return
if start > 0:
previous_line = lines[start - 1].strip()
if previous_line.startswith("@"):
result = previous_line
return result

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Correct the docstring for function_has_decorator

The docstring does not accurately describe the function's purpose.

Apply this diff:

 def function_has_decorator(start, lines):
-    """Extract the arguments of a function read from a file.
+    """Check if a function has a decorator and return it if present.

     Args:
         start: Starting line to process
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
"""Extract the arguments of a function read from a file.
Args:
start: Starting line to process
lines: The file as a list of strings split by a new line separator
Returns:
result: The decorator line
"""
# Initialize key variable
result = None
# Return
if start > 0:
previous_line = lines[start - 1].strip()
if previous_line.startswith("@"):
result = previous_line
return result
def function_has_decorator(start, lines):
"""Check if a function has a decorator and return it if present.
Args:
start: Starting line to process
lines: The file as a list of strings split by a new line separator
Returns:
result: The decorator line
"""
# Initialize key variable
result = None
# Return
if start > 0:
previous_line = lines[start - 1].strip()
if previous_line.startswith("@"):
result = previous_line
return result
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

Comment on lines +77 to +86
"""Extract the docstring from a list of lines read from a file.

Args:
function: Function object
file_path: Path to file under test

Returns:
result: True if function must be ignored

"""
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Correct the inaccurate docstring in ignore_function

The docstring for ignore_function does not accurately describe its purpose. It appears to be copied from another function.

Apply this diff to update the docstring:

 def ignore_function(function, file_path):
-    """Extract the docstring from a list of lines read from a file.
+    """Determine if a function should be ignored based on its name and file path.

     Args:
         function: Function object
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
"""Extract the docstring from a list of lines read from a file.
Args:
function: Function object
file_path: Path to file under test
Returns:
result: True if function must be ignored
"""
"""Determine if a function should be ignored based on its name and file path.
Args:
function: Function object
file_path: Path to file under test
Returns:
result: True if function must be ignored
"""
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

Comment on lines +210 to +238
"""Extract the arguments of a function read from a file.

Args:
item: Decorator to check

Returns:
result: True if an exception

"""
# Initialize key variable
result = False
exceptions = ["@property"]
property_exceptions = ["setter", "getter"]

# Return
for exception in exceptions:
if exception in item.strip():
result = True
break

for exception in property_exceptions:
regex = f"^@[a-zA-Z0-9_]*.{exception}$"
if re.match(regex, item):
result = True
break

# Return
return result

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Update the docstring for decorator_in_docstring_exception_list

The docstring does not reflect the function's actual purpose.

Apply this diff:

 def decorator_in_docstring_exception_list(item):
-    """Extract the arguments of a function read from a file.
+    """Determine if a decorator is in the list of exceptions for docstring requirements.

     Args:
         item: Decorator to check
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
"""Extract the arguments of a function read from a file.
Args:
item: Decorator to check
Returns:
result: True if an exception
"""
# Initialize key variable
result = False
exceptions = ["@property"]
property_exceptions = ["setter", "getter"]
# Return
for exception in exceptions:
if exception in item.strip():
result = True
break
for exception in property_exceptions:
regex = f"^@[a-zA-Z0-9_]*.{exception}$"
if re.match(regex, item):
result = True
break
# Return
return result
def decorator_in_docstring_exception_list(item):
"""Determine if a decorator is in the list of exceptions for docstring requirements.
Args:
item: Decorator to check
Returns:
result: True if an exception
"""
# Initialize key variable
result = False
exceptions = ["@property"]
property_exceptions = ["setter", "getter"]
# Return
for exception in exceptions:
if exception in item.strip():
result = True
break
for exception in property_exceptions:
regex = f"^@[a-zA-Z0-9_]*.{exception}$"
if re.match(regex, item):
result = True
break
# Return
return result
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

Comment on lines +162 to +182
for argument_docstring in arguments_docstring:
# Track whether the argument is defined
# in the function parameters
for argument_function in arguments_function:
if argument_function not in arguments_docstring:
violations.append(
Violation(
line=line_number + 1,
function=function.name,
issue=f"""\
Argument '{argument_function}' defined in the function is not \
an argument in the docstring""",
action=f"""\
Add argument '{argument_function}' to the Docstring""",
)
)
bad_argument_docstring = True
break
if bad_argument_docstring:
break

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove unused loop variable argument_docstring

The variable argument_docstring is not used within the loop, which may indicate a logic error.

Apply this diff:

 # Check whether docstring arguments match function arguments
-for argument_docstring in arguments_docstring:
     # Track whether the argument is defined
     # in the function parameters
     for argument_function in arguments_function:
         if argument_function not in arguments_docstring:
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
for argument_docstring in arguments_docstring:
# Track whether the argument is defined
# in the function parameters
for argument_function in arguments_function:
if argument_function not in arguments_docstring:
violations.append(
Violation(
line=line_number + 1,
function=function.name,
issue=f"""\
Argument '{argument_function}' defined in the function is not \
an argument in the docstring""",
action=f"""\
Add argument '{argument_function}' to the Docstring""",
)
)
bad_argument_docstring = True
break
if bad_argument_docstring:
break
# Track whether the argument is defined
# in the function parameters
for argument_function in arguments_function:
if argument_function not in arguments_docstring:
violations.append(
Violation(
line=line_number + 1,
function=function.name,
issue=f"""\
Argument '{argument_function}' defined in the function is not \
an argument in the docstring""",
action=f"""\
Add argument '{argument_function}' to the Docstring""",
)
)
bad_argument_docstring = True
break
if bad_argument_docstring:
break
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

162-162: Loop control variable argument_docstring not used within loop body

(B007)

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

Comment on lines +101 to +132
"""Extract the docstring from a list of lines read from a file.

Args:
function: Function object
docstring: Docstring object
line_number: Number on which the function resides

Returns:
result: Violation object list

"""
# Initialize key variables
violations = []
bad_argument_function = False
bad_argument_docstring = False
arguments_function = function.arguments
arguments_docstring = [_.arg_name for _ in docstring.parser.params]

# Violation if the arguments don't match and return
if sorted(arguments_function) != sorted(arguments_docstring):
violations.append(
Violation(
line=line_number + 1,
function=function.name,
issue="""\
The arguments defined in the docstring don't match those of the function.""",
action="""\
Adjust your docstring to match the listed function arguments.""",
)
)
return violations

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Update the docstring for match_arguments_to_docstring

The docstring does not match the function's purpose and seems to be copied incorrectly.

Apply this diff to correct the docstring:

 def match_arguments_to_docstring(function, docstring, line_number):
-    """Extract the docstring from a list of lines read from a file.
+    """Check if function arguments match those in the docstring.

     Args:
         function: Function object
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
"""Extract the docstring from a list of lines read from a file.
Args:
function: Function object
docstring: Docstring object
line_number: Number on which the function resides
Returns:
result: Violation object list
"""
# Initialize key variables
violations = []
bad_argument_function = False
bad_argument_docstring = False
arguments_function = function.arguments
arguments_docstring = [_.arg_name for _ in docstring.parser.params]
# Violation if the arguments don't match and return
if sorted(arguments_function) != sorted(arguments_docstring):
violations.append(
Violation(
line=line_number + 1,
function=function.name,
issue="""\
The arguments defined in the docstring don't match those of the function.""",
action="""\
Adjust your docstring to match the listed function arguments.""",
)
)
return violations
"""Check if function arguments match those in the docstring.
Args:
function: Function object
docstring: Docstring object
line_number: Number on which the function resides
Returns:
result: Violation object list
"""
# Initialize key variables
violations = []
bad_argument_function = False
bad_argument_docstring = False
arguments_function = function.arguments
arguments_docstring = [_.arg_name for _ in docstring.parser.params]
# Violation if the arguments don't match and return
if sorted(arguments_function) != sorted(arguments_docstring):
violations.append(
Violation(
line=line_number + 1,
function=function.name,
issue="""\
The arguments defined in the docstring don't match those of the function.""",
action="""\
Adjust your docstring to match the listed function arguments.""",
)
)
return violations
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

requirements.txt Outdated
pytest

# Docstring Parser
docstring_parser
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove duplicate dependency docstring_parser

The package docstring_parser is listed twice in requirements.txt. This duplication can cause confusion or installation issues.

Apply this diff to remove the duplicate:

 # Docstring Parser
 docstring_parser

 # Other
 more-itertools

 # Linting and formatting
 flake8
 flake8-docstrings
 pydocstyle
 black
-docstring_parser

Also applies to: 28-28

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

Comment on lines +76 to +80
- name: Install dependencies
run: |
python -m pip install --upgrade pip
pip install flake8 black pydocstyle flake8-docstrings

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Missing configuration files for linting tools.

The pipeline failures indicate missing configuration files for tox and flake8. These are required for the linting jobs to work correctly.

Create the following files:

  1. tox.ini:
[tox]
envlist = black,flake8,pydocstyle
isolated_build = True

[testenv:black]
deps = black
commands = black --check .

[testenv:flake8]
deps = 
    flake8
    flake8-docstrings
commands = flake8 --docstring-convention google switchmap bin setup tests .github --ignore E402,E722,E203,F401,W503

[testenv:pydocstyle]
deps = pydocstyle
commands = pydocstyle switchmap setup bin tests --convention=google --add-ignore=D415,D205

Would you like me to help create these configuration files or open a GitHub issue to track this task?

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

Comment on lines +232 to +236
- name: Set up Python 3.11
uses: actions/setup-python@v4
with:
python-version: 3.11

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Update actions/setup-python to latest version.

The action actions/setup-python@v4 is outdated. Update to v5 for the latest features and security fixes.

      - name: Set up Python 3.11
-       uses: actions/setup-python@v4
+       uses: actions/setup-python@v5
        with:
          python-version: 3.11
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Set up Python 3.11
uses: actions/setup-python@v4
with:
python-version: 3.11
- name: Set up Python 3.11
uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
python-version: 3.11
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

233-233: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

Comment on lines +205 to +221
Validate-CodeRabbit:
name: Validate CodeRabbit Approval
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]'
needs: [Code-Quality-Checks, Test-Docusaurus-Deployment]
steps:
- name: Checkout Repository
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Validate CodeRabbit.ai Approval
run: |
chmod +x $GITHUB_WORKSPACE/.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
$GITHUB_WORKSPACE/.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
GITHUB_REPOSITORY: ${{ github.repository }}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix shell script quoting in CodeRabbit validation.

The shell script execution needs proper quoting to prevent word splitting and globbing issues.

      - name: Validate CodeRabbit.ai Approval
        run: |
-         chmod +x $GITHUB_WORKSPACE/.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
-         $GITHUB_WORKSPACE/.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
+         chmod +x "$GITHUB_WORKSPACE/.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh"
+         "$GITHUB_WORKSPACE/.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
Validate-CodeRabbit:
name: Validate CodeRabbit Approval
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]'
needs: [Code-Quality-Checks, Test-Docusaurus-Deployment]
steps:
- name: Checkout Repository
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Validate CodeRabbit.ai Approval
run: |
chmod +x $GITHUB_WORKSPACE/.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
$GITHUB_WORKSPACE/.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
GITHUB_REPOSITORY: ${{ github.repository }}
Validate-CodeRabbit:
name: Validate CodeRabbit Approval
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]'
needs: [Code-Quality-Checks, Test-Docusaurus-Deployment]
steps:
- name: Checkout Repository
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Validate CodeRabbit.ai Approval
run: |
chmod +x "$GITHUB_WORKSPACE/.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh"
"$GITHUB_WORKSPACE/.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh"
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
GITHUB_REPOSITORY: ${{ github.repository }}
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

214-214: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:10: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


214-214: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:1: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

Comment on lines +71 to +91
- name: Set up Python
uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
python-version: 3.9

- name: Install dependencies
run: |
python -m pip install --upgrade pip
pip install flake8 black pydocstyle flake8-docstrings

- name: Run Black Formatter Check
run: |
black --check .

- name: Run Flake8 Linter
run: |
flake8 --docstring-convention google switchmap bin setup tests .github --ignore E402,E722,E203,F401,W503

- name: Run pydocstyle
run: |
pydocstyle switchmap setup bin tests --convention=google --add-ignore=D415,D205
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Redundant linting jobs may slow down the workflow.

The Python-Format-Checker and Python-Linter jobs overlap with these checks in the Code-Quality-Checks job. Consider consolidating them into a single job to improve workflow efficiency.

  Code-Quality-Checks:
    name: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      # ... existing steps ...
      
      - name: Install dependencies
        run: |
          python -m pip install --upgrade pip
-         pip install flake8 black pydocstyle flake8-docstrings
+         pip install tox
      
      - name: Run linting and formatting
        run: tox
        env:
          TOXENV: black,flake8,pydocstyle

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Missing configuration file: No tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml found in the project root


[error] Environment 'flake8' not found in configuration file

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit a3e7eb5 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop Jan 12, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@palisadoes palisadoes deleted the docs branch January 12, 2025 00:00
palisadoes added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
* Added Docusaurus

* Removed Talawa references

* Removed bad repo references

* Added markdown files

* Updated markdown (#5)

* Update pull-request.yml

* Update pull-request.yml

* Update pull-request.yml

* Update pull-request.yml

* Update pull-request.yml

* Create .coderabbit.yaml

* Added linters to the pull request GitHub action workflows (#8)

* Added linters to the pull request GitHub action workflows

* Added linters to the pull request GitHub action workflows

* Fixed flake error

* Fixed black error

* Fixed black error v2

* Removed duplicate packages

* easysnmp

* Update check_docstrings.py

* JSON
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant