Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update DOIs #63

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2025
Merged

Update DOIs #63

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2025

Conversation

ypriverol
Copy link
Contributor

@ypriverol ypriverol commented Feb 18, 2025

Update DOIs as requested by: openjournals/joss-reviews#7563 (comment)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced citation entries by adding digital identifiers for easier reference.
    • Streamlined references by removing redundant language specifications.
    • Standardized article title capitalization for improved consistency.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 18, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the bibliographic entries in the paper/paper.bib file. The changes include the removal of the language field from all entries, the addition of a DOI field to each article, and a title capitalization adjustment for one article. These modifications aim to standardize the citation details across multiple entries.

Changes

File Change Summary
paper/paper.bib Removed the language field ("en") from all entries; added DOI fields to six articles; updated the title capitalization in the Dai2024 entry (from "Quantms" to "quantms").

Possibly related PRs

  • last version of the manuscript #62: Updates the article entry for Perez-Riverol with similar DOI additions and modifications, aligning with the changes in this pull request.

Poem

I'm a rabbit tapping keys with glee,
Hopping through BibTeX, setting citations free.
Removing "en" and adding DOIs bright,
Titles refined with a gentle rewrite.
Bound to celebrate these changes in flight!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b5c2f3a and 7da2dc7.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • paper/paper.pdf is excluded by !**/*.pdf
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • paper/paper.bib (6 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (7)
paper/paper.bib (7)

33-34: LGTM! DOI added and redundant language field removed.

The changes improve the bibliographic entry by adding the DOI and removing the redundant language field, as English is the default in BibTeX.


38-39: LGTM! Title case corrected and DOI added.

The changes improve the entry by:

  • Correcting the software name case to "quantms"
  • Adding the DOI
  • Removing the redundant language field

Also applies to: 62-63


110-111: LGTM! DOI added and redundant language field removed.

The changes improve the bibliographic entry by adding the DOI and removing the redundant language field.


156-157: LGTM! DOI added and redundant language field removed.

The changes improve the bibliographic entry by adding the DOI and removing the redundant language field.


187-188: LGTM! DOI added and redundant language field removed.

The changes improve the bibliographic entry by adding the DOI and removing the redundant language field.


226-227: LGTM! DOI added and redundant language field removed.

The changes improve the bibliographic entry by adding the DOI and removing the redundant language field.


1-228:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify DOI accessibility.

Let's verify that all DOIs are accessible and resolve to the correct articles.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if DOIs are accessible via doi.org

# Extract DOIs and check their accessibility
for doi in $(grep -o '"10\.[0-9]\{4\}/[^"]*"' paper/paper.bib | tr -d '"'); do
  echo "Checking DOI: $doi"
  curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://doi.org/$doi"
  echo
done

Length of output: 113


Action Needed: Verify Bibliographic File Path and DOI Accessibility

  • The script couldn't locate the file paper/paper.bib. Please confirm whether the bibliographic data file exists under a different path or has been renamed.
  • Update the DOI verification script with the correct file path and re-run it to ensure all DOIs resolve correctly.
  • If manual DOI verification is preferred, please double-check each DOI from the updated file.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ypriverol ypriverol merged commit 7114d39 into master Feb 18, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant