Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

core: fixing DutyDB Store function #2800

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

pinebit
Copy link
Collaborator

@pinebit pinebit commented Jan 18, 2024

DutyDB's Store() function has inconsistent handling for DutySyncContribution.

category: bug
ticket: none

@pinebit pinebit requested review from gsora, dB2510 and xenowits January 18, 2024 14:12
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (b208521) 53.21% compared to head (abe8949) 53.28%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2800      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   53.21%   53.28%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         199      199              
  Lines       27616    27616              
==========================================
+ Hits        14696    14715      +19     
+ Misses      11097    11081      -16     
+ Partials     1823     1820       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pinebit pinebit added the merge when ready Indicates bulldozer bot may merge when all checks pass label Jan 19, 2024
@obol-bulldozer obol-bulldozer bot merged commit bd8ae06 into main Jan 19, 2024
14 checks passed
@obol-bulldozer obol-bulldozer bot deleted the pinebit/dutydb-store-fix branch January 19, 2024 08:12
gsora pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2024
DutyDB's `Store()` function has inconsistent handling for `DutySyncContribution`.

category: bug
ticket: none
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merge when ready Indicates bulldozer bot may merge when all checks pass qs-audit v0.19.1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants