Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

onnxruntime: 1.18.1 -> 1.20.1; eigen: 3.4.0 -> 3.4.0-unstable-2022-05-19 #364362

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: staging
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mweinelt
Copy link
Member

@mweinelt mweinelt commented Dec 11, 2024

https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/releases/tag/v1.19.0
https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/releases/tag/v1.19.2
https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/releases/tag/v1.20.0
https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/releases/tag/v1.20.1

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux (with and without cudaSupport)
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@wegank wegank added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Dec 31, 2024
@mweinelt mweinelt removed the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Jan 11, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 6.topic: cuda Parallel computing platform and API label Jan 11, 2025
@mweinelt mweinelt marked this pull request as ready for review January 11, 2025 02:17
@mweinelt mweinelt force-pushed the onnxruntime-1.20.1 branch 2 times, most recently from 6ac8ba2 to ebf9826 Compare January 11, 2025 02:51
Copy link
Contributor

@SomeoneSerge SomeoneSerge Jan 11, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this https://github.com/NVIDIA/cudnn-frontend/blob/ee971b18ee428ff55b444ac93876cfbd377d304f/CMakeLists.txt? Why do we have to vendor it, and if we do how do we appropriately attribute it

CC @ConnorBaker

Comment on lines +72 to +75
substituteInPlace include/cudnn_frontend_utils.h \
--replace-fail \
'#include "cudnn_frontend/thirdparty/nlohmann/json.hpp"' \
'#include <nlohmann/json.hpp>'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note for future: perhaps we could patch upstream's target_include_directories&c stanza make the latter work even when they vendor thirdparty?

Comment on lines +112 to +116
if [[ -e "$out/bin" ]]
then
nixErrorLog "The bin directory in \$out should no longer exist."
exit 1
fi
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What should be the contents of $out? It's not bin/ and not python bindings. Cmake modules?

@mweinelt mweinelt changed the base branch from master to staging January 11, 2025 17:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: New
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants