-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 313
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes required for WSL2 #1180
Draft
cdesiniotis
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
wsl
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it make sense to use the
info
package fromgo-nvlib
here instead (for example https://github.com/NVIDIA/k8s-device-plugin/blob/44b263c37e13370f857ef0691b8ab8ff02135c0d/internal/plugin/factory.go#L129).This will allow for consistent detection across components.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with the overall notion of aligning the detection across components, so I have added a commit to use the
info
package as you have suggested.However, the usage of the platform resolver in the
driver-validator
does not work as expected and returnsunknown
as the platform. This is because thelibdxcore.so
library is not in the ldcache, and likewise, neither islibnvidia-ml.so
. The platform resolver works in the device-plugin because the NVIDIA Container Toolkit takes care of injecting thelibdxcore.so
library into the container and updating the ldcache.Let me know if you have any suggestions to get the platform detection working in the
driver-validator
, otherwise I will revert the latest commit I added in favor of the original logic.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at the implementiong in the info package, I don't think there's a way to get this working with the current implementation. I think for the time being, let's revert the proposed change and stick with the existing implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have reverted the commit.