Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a model-name dependence for some cloud fields #236

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

jaymes-kenyon
Copy link
Collaborator

This update uses the model name to correctly assign handles for the ceiling (exp-2) and cloud-base height fields.

Copy link
Collaborator

@cshartsough cshartsough left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Are you anticipating more models having cloud-base graphics, or just using the model name there for completeness/symmetry?

@jaymes-kenyon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi @cshartsough — The main rationale for this PR is the ceiling-exp2 field. A previous PR changed the handle for this field to work with RRFS output, but the same PR inadvertently caused HRRR graphics to stop for this field. With this update, hopefully we will see the ceiling-exp2 plots from both the RRFS and HRRR (each using different handles for the same field).

@cshartsough
Copy link
Collaborator

That's good, I think it should do the trick nicely.

@jaymes-kenyon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I am going to let this run in a RRFS retro overnight, just as a quick test. I will follow-up once I have some successful plots.

@jaymes-kenyon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@cshartsough @Brian-Jamison — My tests have worked, so I think this PR is ready for merging.

@jaymes-kenyon jaymes-kenyon marked this pull request as ready for review February 29, 2024 18:22
@jaymes-kenyon jaymes-kenyon merged commit b603826 into NOAA-GSL:main Feb 29, 2024
2 checks passed
@jaymes-kenyon jaymes-kenyon deleted the cloud_base branch February 29, 2024 18:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants