Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get the right next trade fields on release #422

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2025
Merged

Conversation

grunch
Copy link
Member

@grunch grunch commented Jan 11, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced trade release and fiat sent action logic with improved handling of next trade information
    • Added more precise validation for trade-related actions based on user roles and order status
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved permission checks for trade release and fiat sent actions
    • Refined error handling for trade-related operations

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies two key functions in the Rust codebase: fiat_sent_action in src/app/fiat_sent.rs and release_action in src/app/release.rs. The primary focus is on introducing and handling a new next_trade variable, which captures details about the subsequent trade. The changes enhance the logic for processing trades, particularly around order creation, release, and trade progression, with careful attention to public key validation and order status checks.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/app/fiat_sent.rs Added next_trade variable with pattern matching on payload, updating order.next_trade_pubkey and order.next_trade_index when buyer is range order creator
src/app/release.rs Restructured next_trade handling, modified seller fund release conditions, adjusted public key and status validation logic

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Buyer
    participant Seller
    participant System
    
    Buyer->>System: Initiate Trade
    System->>System: Validate Next Trade Details
    System->>Seller: Process Trade Release
    alt Valid Seller Public Key
        System->>System: Update Order Status
        Seller->>System: Confirm Release
    else Invalid Public Key
        System->>Seller: Release Not Allowed
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of trades so bright,
Where next_trade dances in the light,
Pubkeys checked with careful might,
Orders flow from wrong to right,
A code ballet of pure delight! 🔑


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a17b33b and 0769984.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/app/fiat_sent.rs (0 hunks)
  • src/app/release.rs (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/app/fiat_sent.rs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: tests
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/app/release.rs (5)

87-98: LGTM! Secure seller validation.

The implementation correctly validates that only the seller can release funds, with appropriate error handling.


Line range hint 113-127: LGTM! Clear status validation.

The status validation is comprehensive and well-implemented, with clean error handling using the matches! macro.


Line range hint 211-222: LGTM! Proper cleanup of next trade fields.

The implementation correctly cleans up next trade fields and safely handles type conversion for the index.


99-111: Verify potential integer overflow.

While the pattern matching logic is well-structured, there's a potential risk when casting next_trade_index from i64 to u32 on line 108.

Run this script to check for large index values that could cause overflow:

✅ Verification successful

Casting between next_trade_index types is safe

The integer casting in this code is safe because:

  • Values originate as u32 from the NextTrade payload
  • They are stored as i64 in the database and struct
  • Converting back to u32 cannot overflow as the values are guaranteed to be within u32 range
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potentially large next_trade_index values
# that could overflow when cast to u32

rg -l "next_trade_index.*[0-9]{10,}" 

# Check for any explicit large number assignments
ast-grep --pattern 'next_trade_index = Some($NUM)' | grep -E '[0-9]{10,}'

Length of output: 114


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check type definition and usage of next_trade_index
rg "next_trade_index" -B 2 -A 2

# Find struct definition containing next_trade_index
ast-grep --pattern 'struct $_ {
  $$$
  next_trade_index: $_,
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 2327


Line range hint 1-498: Consider adding test coverage for next_trade scenarios.

The changes introduce complex logic for handling next_trade, but there appears to be no corresponding test coverage for these scenarios. Consider adding tests for:

  • Different next_trade patterns (creator vs stored values)
  • Edge cases in index handling
  • Status validation with next_trade

Run this script to check for existing test coverage:


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@grunch grunch merged commit cb3ba19 into main Jan 11, 2025
2 checks passed
@grunch grunch deleted the KM_fixes-on-action-release branch January 11, 2025 21:29
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant