Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
ping: try next addrinfo on connect failure
On hosts that have routing rules matching on the outgoing interface [1], getaddrinfo() may return results sorted in a suboptimal order because it is not aware of the network interface passed to ping via the "-I" option. In particular, address reachability detection may fail and getaddrinfo() will return ipv6 results first, even though the only routes available are ipv4. Improve user experience by trying next addrinfo entry if we encounter a failure at connect() time because of missing or unreachable routes. [1] For example, on switches running Cumulus Linux, the default VRF is used for front ports and a "mgmt" VRF is used for the management interface, which also handles all DNS traffic. (VRFs apply different routing rules based on the iif/oif, ie. influenced by SO_BINDTODEVICE.) In the default vrf, it's possible to ping an ipv4 address via the mgmt vrf by specifying "-I mgmt". However, that will fail if the target host is specified by name, has a AAAA record and there is no ipv6 route to it. Since libc commit 5ddb5bf5fb, getaddrinfo() does a udp connect to result addresses to check if there is a route to them. This is to implement RFC3484 §6 Rule 1 ("Avoid unusable destinations") which is part of the algorithm to order results. getaddrinfo() is unaware of ping's "-I" option and tries to connect its socket via the default vrf, which has no ipv6 route to the target host (and, in fact, no ipv4 route either). Following this failure, getaddrinfo() returns results ordered according to /etc/gai.conf (Rule 6) - by default, ipv6 first. ping tries only the first entry returned by getaddrinfo() and fails to connect to it because there is no ipv6 route to the host, even in the mgmt vrf. However, if getaddrinfo() had ordered the ipv4 result first or ping had tried the next addrinfo entry (the ipv4 one), ping could connect a udp socket to it and later successfully exchange icmp messages with it. Example: cumulus@act-5812-10:~$ ip vrf list Name Table ----------------------- mgmt 1001 cumulus@act-5812-10:~$ ip vrf identify cumulus@act-5812-10:~$ # --> default vrf cumulus@act-5812-10:~$ cumulus@act-5812-10:~$ ip rule 99: from all to 10.230.0.53 ipproto udp dport 53 lookup mgmt 99: from all to 10.20.249.1 ipproto udp dport 53 lookup mgmt 1000: from all lookup [l3mdev-table] 32765: from all lookup local 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default cumulus@act-5812-10:~$ ip route cumulus@act-5812-10:~$ ip -6 route ::1 dev lo proto kernel metric 256 pref medium cumulus@act-5812-10:~$ ip route show vrf mgmt default via 10.230.130.1 dev eth0 unreachable default metric 4278198272 10.230.130.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.230.130.211 127.0.0.0/8 dev mgmt proto kernel scope link src 127.0.0.1 cumulus@act-5812-10:~$ ip -6 route show vrf mgmt ::1 dev mgmt proto kernel metric 256 pref medium anycast fe80:: dev eth0 proto kernel metric 0 pref medium fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium ff00::/8 dev eth0 metric 256 pref medium unreachable default dev lo metric 4278198272 pref medium cumulus@act-5812-10:~$ host google.com google.com has address 172.217.0.46 google.com has IPv6 address 2607:f8b0:4005:802::200e google.com mail is handled by 30 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com. google.com mail is handled by 40 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com. google.com mail is handled by 20 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com. google.com mail is handled by 10 aspmx.l.google.com. google.com mail is handled by 50 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com. Success with numeric address cumulus@act-5812-10:~$ ping -n -c1 -I mgmt 172.217.0.46 ping: Warning: source address might be selected on device other than mgmt. PING 172.217.0.46 (172.217.0.46) from 10.230.130.211 mgmt: 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 172.217.0.46: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=4.68 ms --- 172.217.0.46 ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.675/4.675/4.675/0.000 ms Failure with host by name cumulus@act-5812-10:~$ ping -n -c1 -I mgmt google.com connect: No route to host Success when running in the mgmt vrf because getaddrinfo()'s address reachability test is effective and ipv4 result(s) are ordered first. cumulus@act-5812-10:~$ ip vrf exec mgmt ping -n -c1 google.com PING google.com (172.217.0.46) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 172.217.0.46: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=4.65 ms --- google.com ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.650/4.650/4.650/0.000 ms For demonstration purposes, the following configuration allows to reproduce a similar problem. Starting from a host with a vanilla configuration, default ipv4 route using eth0, no ipv6 global routes: root@vsid:~# ip route default via 192.168.15.1 dev eth0 192.168.15.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.15.100 root@vsid:~# ip -6 route ::1 dev lo proto kernel metric 256 pref medium fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium root@vsid:~# ip rou flush table main root@vsid:~# ip rou add table 1 192.168.15.0/24 dev eth0 root@vsid:~# ip rou add table 1 default via 192.168.15.1 root@vsid:~# ip rule 0: from all lookup local 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default root@vsid:~# ip rule add pref 1 to 192.168.15.1 ipproto udp dport 53 lookup 1 root@vsid:~# ip rule add pref 2 oif eth0 lookup 1 root@vsid:~# ping -c1 -I eth0 google.com ping: connect: Network is unreachable With the current patch root@vsid:~# /src/iputils/builddir/ping/ping -c1 -I eth0 google.com PING (172.217.174.110) from 192.168.15.100 eth0: 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from nrt12s28-in-f14.1e100.net (172.217.174.110): icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=11.3 ms --- ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 11.313/11.313/11.313/0.000 ms Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information