Tad reporting standard

[ChristopherSpelt]

TAD Reporting Standard

This PR contains the first version of the TAD reporting standard.

Reading order suggestions:

• Read "introduction" and "intended usage"
• Read the YAML example
• Read the "specification of the standard"
• Read the JSON schema

Expected shortcomings:

• It is highly likely that we need to revise the standard to avoid very large yaml files. This explicitly has not been taken into account yet.
• It is highly likely that we need to revise the datatypes.
• It is highly likely that the way we capture measurements needs to be adjusted.

The shortcomings will probably be exposed at the moment we will try to actually write an example output, at which point we can address them.

[anneschuth]

Very nice! Left some remarks. Some may be debatable or premature.

[berrydenhartog]

Some small comments

[anneschuth]

LGTM!

[laurensWe]

In general this is great, the amount of details is just right and I think it captures everything that we would deem necessary for modelcards (both technical and assessmental) and it is flexibel enough to be extended by different graph measurements for example.

[robbertbos]

@ChristopherSpelt thanks for this initial proposal for the TAD reporting standard. With this review I hope to share some additional ideas, so we can make it even better. If you want to discuss some of my comments, please let me know.

[laurensWe]

Just one minor remark, looks really good to me now :)

[robbertbos]

@ChristopherSpelt thanks for this new version. I left some comments and suggestions. I also propose to have a (short) meeting to talk about a couple of comments because I think that way we can align on them faster. I will bring it up during the standup tomorrow.

[anneschuth]

Amazing! 3 small ones

[robbertbos]

@ChristopherSpelt thanks for this new version. I think we should merge this version, so we can finish the first itteration. It was great working with you, and the team, on this!

There is one "bug" we should fix before we can complete this PR. The rest of my comments are just suggestions. Feel free to ignore them.

[robbertbos]

Looking good!