Create 0011-researcher-in-residence.md (#65)

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Anne Schuth <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Anne Schuth <[email protected]>

docs/ADRs/0011-researcher-in-residence.md

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+# ADR-Researcher in Residence
+
+## Context
+
+The AI validation team works transparently. Working with public funds warrants transparency toward the public.
+Additionally, being transparent aligns with the team's mission of increasing the transparency of public organizations.
+In line with this reasoning, it is important to be open to researchers interested in the work of the AI validation team.
+Allowing researchers to conduct research within the team contributes to transparency and enables external perspectives
+and feedback to be incorporated into the team's work.
+
+## Assumptions
+
+- Having researchers in residence is a mechanism that facilitates transparency.
+- Research enables external feedback and perspectives to be incorporated into the team's work.
+- Having researchers in residence from other disciplines facilitates an interdisciplinary exchange of ideas in light of
+  interdisciplinary issues.
+- Research outcomes enable knowledge exchange between the scientific community and public organizations, in the
+  Netherlands and abroad.
+
+## Decision
+
+We have decided to include a researcher in residence as a member of our team.
+
+The researcher in residence takes the following form:
+
+- They join and participate in refinement meetings and other meetings of relevance.
+- They share their reflections and present their (interim) research findings.
+- They are provided access to the communication channel of the team (Mattermost).
+- They meet with a contact person bi-weekly to discuss questions and relevant progress and findings.
+- The are independent as they are employed and financed by their respective university.
+- The results of their research, and thus processed data, are published in an academic journal.
+
+The following conditions apply to the researcher in residence.
+
+- The research is able to access and analyze documents relevant to the research (ex. Notes/minutes taken). These
+  documents are submitted to a member of the team for review prior to being processed.
+- Any data collected and analyzed via interviews is done on the basis of informed consent.
+- The data collected is not shared with other parties and is handled ethically by the researcher.
+- No information, aggregation, or summary of information from the communication channel of the team (Mattermost) is
+  collected, processed, or analyzed by the researcher.
+
+## Risks
+
+Risks around a potential chilling effect (team members not feeling free to express themselves) are mitigated by the
+conditions we impose.
+In light of aforementioned form and conditions above, we see no further significant risks.
+
+## Consequences
+
+Including a researcher in residence makes it easier for them to conduct research within both the team and the wider
+organization where the AI validation team operates. This benefits the quality of the research findings and the feedback
+provided to the team and organization.

docs/About/team.md

@@ -30,7 +30,8 @@
     ![Lucas Haitsma](../img/lucas.jpeg){: .round }
 
     Lucas is PhD candidate conducting research into the regulation and governance of algorithmic discrimination by
-    supervision and enforcement organizations.
+    supervision and enforcement organizations. Lucas is our
+    [Researcher in Residence](../ADRs/0011-researcher-in-residence.md).
 
     [:fontawesome-brands-linkedin: Lucas Haitsma](https://www.linkedin.com/in/lucas-h-779375139/)