Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

WIP: exclude goerli from default network state #5094

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

WIP: exclude goerli from default network state #5094

wants to merge 6 commits into from
+352 −288

Conversation

salimtb
Copy link
Contributor

@salimtb salimtb commented Dec 20, 2024

Explanation

References

Changelog

@metamask/package-a

  • : Your change here
  • : Your change here

@metamask/package-b

  • : Your change here
  • : Your change here

Checklist

  • I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate
  • I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or updated code as appropriate
  • I've highlighted breaking changes using the "BREAKING" category above as appropriate
  • I've prepared draft pull requests for clients and consumer packages to resolve any breaking changes

@salimtb salimtb changed the title fix: exclude goerli from default network state WIP: exclude goerli from default network state Dec 20, 2024
@salimtb salimtb mentioned this pull request Jan 6, 2025
Merged
7 tasks
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit to MetaMask/metamask-mobile that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2025
@salimtb
fix: remove goerli infura from network state (#12838)
2215339 
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**

core PR: MetaMask/core#5094
<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

## **Related issues**

Fixes: #12837

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Run the app locally
2. you should not see the verbose logs , or any request sent to Goerli

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@salimtb